Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cult Health Sex. 2014 Oct 1;17(1):92–103. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.950982

Table 3.

Functional health and mental well-being of kathoeys and toms in Chiagmai, according to cross-sex hormone use

Katdoeys
(n=60)
Using cross-
sex
hormones
(n=21)
Not using cross-
sex hormones
(n=39)
p-
value

Dispositional optimism – mean ± SD 12.8 ± 0.4 13.2 ± 0.5 0.53
Social Functioning Questionnaire – mean ± SD 7.3 ± 0.4 6.3 ± 1.0 0.25
Short Form 36 (SF-36) subscales:
  • Bodily pain 61.4 ± 4.9 68.8 ± 7.1 0.42
  • Role-Physical 75.6 ± 5.2 81.3 ± 6.3 0.55
  • Physical functioning 75.5 ± 2.8 78.1 ± 4.3 0.62
  • Social functioning 72.0 ± 3.5 68.8 ± 8.5 0.68
  • Mental health 62.1 ± 2.4 71.3 ± 4.2 0.06
  • Role-Emotional 68.2 ± 5.8 83.3 ± 8.1 0.17
  • Vitality 62.2 ± 2.2 69.4 ± 2.9 0.08
  • General health 58.5 ± 3.0 64.1 ± 4.4 0.33

Toms
(n=60)
Using cross-
sex
hormones
(n=23)
Not using cross-
sex hormones)
(n=37)
p-
value

Dispositional optimism – mean ± SD 12.8 ± 0.5 13.1 ± 0.2 0.45
Social Functioning Questionnaire – mean ± SD 7.5 ± 0.5 6.1 ± 0.6 0.12
Short Form 36 (SF-36) subscales:
  • Bodily pain 50.5 ± 6.6 72.3 ± 4.3 0.005
  • Role-Physical 81.0 ± 7.3 88.5 ± 4.0 0.33
  • Physical functioning 78.8 ± 2.8 81.4 ± 2.7 0.55
  • Social functioning 68.3 ± 4.6 75.2 ± 3.4 0.23
  • Mental health 58.7 ± 3.4 71.6 ± 2.3 0.002
  • Role-Emotional 71.4 ± 7.7 82.9 ± 5.3 0.22
  • Vitality 60.7 ± 2.8 68.2 ± 2.5 0.06
  • General health 54.3 ± 4.1 63.3 ± 2.8 0.07