Figure 9.
Neuronal and glial mass fractions are well predicted by measured glial cell density. (A) Estimated neuronal mass fraction (fn) in each brain structure in each species is plotted as a function of the inverse of the measured neuronal density in the structure (d−1nmes, left) and as a function of the inverse of the measured glial density in the structure (d−1gmes, right). (B) Estimated glial mass fraction (fg) in each brain structure in each species is plotted as a function of the inverse of the measured neuronal density in the structure (d−1nmes, left) and as a function of the inverse of the measured glial density in the structure (d−1gmes, right). Notice that neuronal (or glial) mass fraction is well predicted by variations in glial cell density, but not in neuronal cell density. Inverse of cell densities given in picograms/neuron. Functions plotted are (A) fn = 0.265 (d−1gmes)0.356 ± 0.019 (r2 = 0.823, p < 0.0001) and (B) fg = 2.008 (d−1gmes)−0.716 ± 0.026 (r2 = 0.906, p < 0.0001). Cerebral cortex plotted as circles, cerebellum as squares, and rest of brain as triangles; eulipotyphlans shown in orange, primates in red, and rodents in green. Data from Herculano-Houzel et al. (2006, 2007, 2011), Azevedo et al. (2009), Sarko et al. (2009), and Gabi et al. (2010).