Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 12;8:127. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00127

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Neuronal and glial mass fractions are well predicted by measured glial cell density. (A) Estimated neuronal mass fraction (fn) in each brain structure in each species is plotted as a function of the inverse of the measured neuronal density in the structure (d−1nmes, left) and as a function of the inverse of the measured glial density in the structure (d−1gmes, right). (B) Estimated glial mass fraction (fg) in each brain structure in each species is plotted as a function of the inverse of the measured neuronal density in the structure (d−1nmes, left) and as a function of the inverse of the measured glial density in the structure (d−1gmes, right). Notice that neuronal (or glial) mass fraction is well predicted by variations in glial cell density, but not in neuronal cell density. Inverse of cell densities given in picograms/neuron. Functions plotted are (A) fn = 0.265 (d−1gmes)0.356 ± 0.019 (r2 = 0.823, p < 0.0001) and (B) fg = 2.008 (d−1gmes)−0.716 ± 0.026 (r2 = 0.906, p < 0.0001). Cerebral cortex plotted as circles, cerebellum as squares, and rest of brain as triangles; eulipotyphlans shown in orange, primates in red, and rodents in green. Data from Herculano-Houzel et al. (2006, 2007, 2011), Azevedo et al. (2009), Sarko et al. (2009), and Gabi et al. (2010).