Table 2.
Continuous variable (S/P % ELISA readings) |
Categorical variable (Milk ELISA MAP positive/negative) |
||||||
Dependent variable Milk ELISA |
Coefficient |
P Value significant: P < 0.05 |
95% C.I. | Odds ratio | P value | 95% C.I. |
Model (P value <0.001) |
Independent variable | |||||||
Time point | |||||||
June 20 vs. Maya | 17.2 | <0.001 | 14.3, 20.2 | 11.1 | <0.001 | 5.8, 21.0 | |
July 11 vs. May | 5.43 | <0.001 | 2.5, 8.4 | 2.7 | 0.004 | 1.4, 5.1 | |
July 24 vs. May | 0.29 | 0.850 | −2.7, 3.3 | 1.1 | 0.819 | 0.5, 2.3 | |
August 8 vs. May | 0.94 | 0.537 | −2.1, 3.9 | 1.1 | 0.831 | 0.5, 2.3 | Sampling time point |
August 21 vs. May | 0.42 | 0.784 | −2.6, 3.4 | 1.1 | 0.829 | 0.5, 2.3 | Parity |
Oct vs. May | 1.51 | 0.322 | −1.5, 4.5 | 1.8 | 0.105 | 0.9, 3.5 | Breed |
Nov vs. May | 5.65 | <0.001 | 2.6, 8.7 | 2.5 | 0.007 | 1.3, 4.9 | Calving date |
Parity | |||||||
1b vs. 2 | −11.2 | <0.001 | −5.4, −17.0 | 0.3 | 0.004 | 1.6, 10.3 | |
2 vs. 3 | 11.2 | 0.001 | 17.5, 4.7 | 3.3 | 0.025 | 0.1, 0.9 | |
2 vs. 4 | 8.3 | 0.002 | 13.5, 3.1 | 2.5 | 0.014 | 0.2, 0.8 |
aMay is the ELISA sample taken pre SICCT. bParity 1: 1st lactation. No significant interactions identified with other independent variables. C.I., confidence interval. Coefficient, difference across the sample population. Statistically significant P values highlighted in bold.