Table 4.
Pathway-level simulation results under three different scenarios.
Method | case:control = 500:500 | case:control = 1000:1000 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARTP | MGSEA | SCC | ARTP | MGSEA | SCC | |
ScenarioA | 0.852 | 0.754 | 0.757 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.996 |
ScenarioB | 0.755 | 0.529 | 0.784 | 0.994 | 0.971 | 0.998 |
ScenarioC | 0.383 | 0.294 | 0.489 | 0.863 | 0.747 | 0.905 |
Under the null | 0.051 | 0.042 | 0.050 | 0.045 | 0.043 | 0.048 |
The highest power among the three methods (ARTP, MGSEA and SCC) is highlighted with bold font.