Table 5. Fit Indices for Stage 2 TSSEM Subsample Analyses.
| Subsample | Model | n | Number of studies | χ2 | df | SRMR | RMSEA | CFI | GFI | BIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vets-GW | 4a | 7,160 | 6 | 488.5 | 113 | .20 | .065 | .99 | .98 | 843 |
| 4b | 481 | 113 | .20 | .064 | .99 | .98 | 836a | |||
| Vets-NGW | 4a | 705 | 4 | 364.09 | 113 | .15 | .053 | .99 | .98 | 626 |
| 4b | 353.52 | 113 | .15 | .052 | .99 | .98 | 615a | |||
| IPV-SA | 4a | 384 | 4 | 461.69 | 113 | .13 | .063 | .97 | .97 | 700 |
| 4b | 440.32 | 113 | .12 | .061 | .97 | .97 | 678a | |||
| IPV-NSA | 4a | 2,762 | 8 | 491.29 | 113 | .18 | .065 | .98 | .98 | 807 |
| 4b | 490.80 | 113 | .18 | .064 | .98 | .98 | 806a | |||
| CAPS | 4a | 1,024 | 8 | 725.46 | 113 | .086 | .054 | .97 | .98 | 1,002 |
| 4b | 668.69 | 113 | .078 | .051 | .98 | .98 | ||||
| PCL-C | 4a | 4,106 | 9 | 1,380.94 | 113 | .078 | .049 | .99 | .99 | 1,714 |
| 4b | 1,301.37 | 113 | .073 | .047 | .99 | .99 | 1,634a | |||
| PCL-M | 4a | 4,418 | 4 | 362.85 | 113 | .14 | .053 | .99 | .98 | 699 |
| 4b | 281.54 | 113 | .11 | .044 | .99 | .99 | 617a |
Note. TSSEM = two-stage structural equation modeling; SRMR = standardized root-mean-square residual; RMSEA = root-mean-square error of approximation; CFI = comparative fit index; GFI = goodness-of-fit index; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; Vets-GW = veterans of the Gulf War; Vets-NGW = non-Gulf-War veterans; IPV-SA = interpersonal violence with substance abuse; IPV-NSA = interpersonal violence without substance abuse; PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder; CAPS = Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale; PCL-C = PTSD Checklist Civilian Version; PCL-M = PTSD Checklist Military Version.
Lower BIC values within each model comparison.