Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 12;27(6):515–529. doi: 10.1111/tri.12309

Table 3.

Late-withdrawal of steroid therapy in adult heart transplantation recipients.

References Study design Participants and intervention Survival Rejection Infections and other ADRs Authors' conclusions Quality assessment
60 Retrospective SG: 27 patients, mean age 51 years, 89% of males. SFM: 37 patients, mean age 45 years, 81% males.
Steroid withdrawal was attempted in the whole group. Analyses were then conducted “as treated”.
SG: Cyc + AZA + prednisone;
SFM: as SG plus steroid withdrawal within 1 year
Not analyzed Rejection rates similar in both the groups, with a nonsignificant lower trend in the SFM group at 12- and 24-month follow-up Incidence of infections similar in both the groups with a trend toward lower rates among SFM patients from 6 months on (P = ns). After transplantation, there was a significant weight gain in both the groups compared with baseline, but no direct comparison between the 2 groups was performed There is a trend toward reduction of rejection incidence after 12 months with no increase in the number of infection episodes High quality
61* Observational prospective study SG: 21 patients, mean age 44.5 years, 86% males; SFM group: 23 patients, mean age 45.6 years, 91% males.
Analyses were probably conducted as treated. Many patients were excluded from analysis.
SG: Cyc + AZA + prednisone;
SFM: as SG plus steroid withdrawal within 1 year
Not analyzed End point analysis was performed at 1 year post-transplantation. Rejection rates were similar in both the groups (SG: 18% vs. SFM: 23%, = 0.825) Similar proportion of overweight (= 0.384), hypertension (= 0.490), diabetes (= 0.187) and severe infections (= 0.592) in SG compared with SFM The use of corticosteroids for more than 1 year is not likely to provide clinical benefit in orthotopic heart transplantation Medium quality
62 Retrospective Fifty-six patients discharged on triple-drug immunosuppression and on whom steroid withdrawal was attempted after 6 months. 12% (5/43) of patients were steroid-free at 1 year, and this proportion grew up to 75% (28/37) at 2 years. No data on demographic characteristics were shown.
All patients: Cyc + AZA or MMF + Prednisone and steroid withdrawal attempted at 6 months
Analyses were conducted on the whole sample. 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates were 98%, 93%, 93%, 88% (one moment missing, not clear which) On the whole sample, freedom from a first rejection episode was 71% at 1 month, 61% at 6 months, 61% at 12 months, 59% at 24 months, and 53% at 36 months On the whole sample, freedom from infection was 85%, 79%, 77% 72% and 67% at 1, 6, 24 and 36 months, respectively Despite the small number of patients in the series, the rate of infection, rejection, and transplant vasculopathy seemed not to be increased using a protocol that stressed steroid withdrawal High quality
63 Retrospective SG: 65 patients, mean age 47 years, M:F = 48:17. SFM: 72 patients, mean age 48.4 years, M:F = 60:12.
Steroid withdrawal was attempted in the whole group. SG: Cyc + AZA + prednisone; SFM: as SG plus steroid withdrawal within 1 year.
Analyses were conducted on patients still alive at 1 year after transplantation, and groups were defined “as treated”
At 5 years, estimated survival was 93% in SFM group vs. 77% in SG (= 0.0001). Independent predictors of better survival were being a white patient in both SMF and SG groups, while group per se had no significant impact on survival Rejection rates were lower in SFM group (1.3 episode/pt in SFM vs. 2.3 episodes/pt in SG, < 0.0001) However, no difference in severity was observed (= 0.158 for year 1 and = 0.930 for subsequent years) Not analyzed In the context of tailoring immunosuppressive treatment, the results of this study support the approach of attempting to wean steroids in white recipients of heart transplantation. High quality
64 Observational prospective study SG: 16 patients, mean age 54 years, 71% males. SFM group: 25 patients, mean age 52 years, 58% males.
Steroid withdrawal was attempted in the whole group. Analyses were then conducted “as treated”.
SG: MMF + TC+ Corticosteroids
SFM: as SG plus steroid withdrawal within 1 year matched
Not analyzed Outcomes were assessed after 1 year following steroids' discontinuation. SFM group had significantly lower rejection rates compared with SG (0.22 vs. 0.82 episodes/pt/year, = 0.04) Serious late infections were significantly more frequent in SG compared with SFM group (0.60 vs. 0 infections/pt/year, < 0.001). No significant differences with respect to blood pressure, hyperglycemia, body mass index, cholesterol and LDL levels were observed between the two groups, but almost all patients were also receiving statins Unlike metabolic benefits of steroid withdrawal with Cyc, heart transplant recipients treated with TC and MMF demonstrated no incremental metabolic benefits, but instead experienced benefits of decreased serious late infections High quality
65 Observational prospective study with retrospective controls SG: 1260 patients retrospectively reviewed, mean age 48.8 years, 82.7% males. SFM: 420 patients followed prospectively, mean age 48 years, 82.9% males.
Most patients (>90%) received Cyc-based immunosuppression. Steroid withdrawal was attempted in the SFM group at 6 months after transplantation. No further details are provided
Seven-year survival rates were significantly higher in SFM group (76% in SFM vs. 66.9% in SG, = 0.0008) The rate of patients requiring treatment for rejection at 5 years was similar in the two groups (35% in SFM vs. 30.6% in SG, = 0.148) SFM group experienced lower high cholesterol cases (total cholesterol >300 mg/dL: 5.3% in SFM vs. 8.4 in SG, = 0.007) and a trend toward lower high pressure cases (SBP >150 mmHg: 22.1% in SFM vs. 25.9 in SG, = 0.063). No significant differences were found regarding any other secondary end point (hypertension treatment rates, osteonecrosis, osteoporosis, cataracts) Good long-term outcomes and no worsening of allograft function after steroid withdrawal in low-risk cardiac transplant recipients on Cyc-based immunosuppression Medium quality
66 Retrospective SG: 82 patients transplanted between 1999 and 2001, mean age 51 years, 78% males. SFM: 83 patients transplanted between 2002 and 2004, mean age 53 years, 66% males.
Comparison of two different therapeutic approaches instituted at the hospital in different times (SG: 1999–2001, SFM: 2002–2004).
SG: Cyc or TAC + MMF or AZA + Prednisone.
SFM: as SG plus steroid withdrawal starting at 1 year
No difference in estimated survival rates between the two groups (= 0.53) No statistically significant differences in the rates of significant rejections at 1 year (40% in SG vs. 49% in SFM, = 0.24) nor at 2 years (7.4% in SG vs. 9.2% in SFM, = 0.70) Data on lipids and HgA1c not comparable between the two groups because of different dyslipidemia treatment regimen or not routine testing of HgA1c until 2001 With an aggressive steroid-weaning strategy, it seems to be possible to have almost all patients steroid-free by 1 year post-transplant High quality
67 Retrospective Comparison of 4 groups of patients >50 years, 82% males, as treated. SG: continuation of steroids for 5 years after HT (A: CS <5 mg/d, B: CS>5 mg/d); SFM: steroid discontinuation after at least 1 years (C: with subsequent CS reintroduction, D: complete steroid withdrawal) No differences in the estimated survival rates between the four groups (= 0.34) Not analyzed Not described Late steroid withdrawal was not associated with an increased mortality. Patients from whom CSs are withdrawn must be monitored to detect the need for reintroduction Medium quality
68 Retrospective Comparison of 3 groups of patients >50 years, 82% males, as treated. SGs: continuation of steroids for 5 years after HT (A: CS <5 mg/d, B: CS>5 mg/d); SFM: steroid discontinuation after at least 1 year Not analyzed Not described The incidence of hypertension increased with the increasing CS dosage. No difference were observed regarding incidence of diabetes and of bone fractures Maintaining steroid therapy beyond the first year significantly increased their risk of becoming hypertensive over the following 2 years. Any effect on diabetes or liability to bone fracture must in general show a slower evolution; therefore, conclusions cannot be drawn Medium quality
69 One-arm prospective trial One arm: 40 patients, 82.5% males, mean age 56.5, 13 ± 3 years after HT. Steroid withdrawal and Cyc reduction attempted in the whole group with the introduction of MMF Not analyzed. One patient died of miocardial infarction Suspected rejections occurred in 8% of patients (one case for noncompliance) Significant improvement of most cardiovascular risk factors, of blood pressure and of renal function.
Quality of life decreased rapidly after steroid withdrawal.
Dropouts occurred for 42% of patients. Of these, 36% were attributable to steroid withdrawal syndrome
Better focusing on patients under CS for no longer than 2 years. In these patients, the cardiovascular risk will probably improve without the side effect of CS-withdrawal syndrome 6/10

AZA, azathioprine; Cyc, cyclosporine; CSs, corticosteroids; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; OKT3, muromonab-CD3; SFM, steroid-free maintenance group; SG, steroid group; TC, tacrolimus; TMG, thymoglobulin.

*

Delgado et al. report P-values not adequate to the frequencies indicated. Here are reported re-computed P-values from the chi-squares proposed in the original paper.