Table 1. Performance of classification of CXRs dataset, DA using various feature extraction methods.
Feature* | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | Precision | F-score | GMean | AUC | CI# | SE# |
Gabor1 | 0.865 | 0.808 | 0.923 | 0.913 | 0.857 | 0.864 | 0.888 | 0.769–0.958 | 0.0482 |
Gab2 | 0.865 | 0.885 | 0.846 | 0.852 | 0.868 | 0.865 | 0.919 | 0.809–0.976 | 0.0392 |
Gab3 | 0.712 | 0.654 | 0.769 | 0.739 | 0.694 | 0.709 | 0.771 | 0.633–0.876 | 0.0668 |
Gist1 | 0.942 | 0.961 | 0.923 | 0.925 | 0.943 | 0.942 | 0.957 | 0.861–0.994 | 0.0301 |
Gist2 | 0.885 | 0.846 | 0.923 | 0.917 | 0.880 | 0.884 | 0.905 | 0.792–0.969 | 0.0444 |
Gist3 | 0.827 | 0.808 | 0.846 | 0.840 | 0.824 | 0.827 | 0.868 | 0.746–0.946 | 0.0497 |
HOG1 | 0.865 | 0.846 | 0.885 | 0.880 | 0.863 | 0.865 | 0.904 | 0.790–0.968 | 0.0456 |
HOG2 | 0.846 | 0.769 | 0.923 | 0.909 | 0.833 | 0.843 | 0.880 | 0.760–0.954 | 0.0483 |
HOG3 | 0.865 | 0.846 | 0.885 | 0.880 | 0.863 | 0.865 | 0.907 | 0.793–0.970 | 0.0440 |
PHOG1 | 0.923 | 0.885 | 0.962 | 0.958 | 0.920 | 0.922 | 0.956 | 0.859–0.993 | 0.0294 |
PHOG2 | 0.827 | 0.769 | 0.885 | 0.870 | 0.816 | 0.825 | 0.859 | 0.735–0.940 | 0.0520 |
PHOG3 | 0.808 | 0.846 | 0.769 | 0.786 | 0.815 | 0.807 | 0.828 | 0.698–0.919 | 0.0577 |
GLCM2 | 0.808 | 0.769 | 0.846 | 0.833 | 0.800 | 0.807 | 0.859 | 0.735–0.940 | 0.0510 |
GLCM3 | 0.654 | 0.769 | 0.538 | 0.625 | 0.690 | 0.644 | 0.623 | 0.478–0.753 | 0.0803 |
*Features extracted from: 1 indicates whole CXR, 2 indicates manually segmented CXR and 3 indicates automatic segmented CXR.
CI refers to confidence interval at 95% at P-value <0.0001 whereas SE refers to standard error for AUC.