Table 6.
Post-hoc paired comparisons after Kruskal-Wallis analysis
| Hypothesis |
Observed |
Holm threshold |
Holm adjusted p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| p-value | value |
=max{6p
6
, 5p
5
, 4p
4
, 3p
3
, 2p
2
, p
1
; kp
k
} |
|
| k = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 | |||
| H1 |
0.102 |
stop |
0.102 = max (0, 0, 0.024, 0.033, 0.070, 0.102) |
| H2 |
0.035 |
0.05/2 = 0.025 |
0.070 = max (0, 0, 0.024, 0.033, 0.070) |
| H3 |
0.011 |
0.05/3 = 0.017 |
0.033^ = max (0, 0, 0.024, 0.033) |
| H4 |
0.006 |
0.05/4 = 0.013 |
0.024^ = max (0, 0, 0.024) |
| H5 |
0.000 |
0.05/5 = 0.010 |
0.000^ = max (0, 0) |
| H6 | 0.000 | 0.05/6 = 0.008 | 0.000^ = max (0) |
H1: Hypoplasia+VDs vs. Miopragia+VDs, H2: Miopragia+VDs vs. Hypoplasia+Miopragia+VDs.
H3: Hypoplasia+VDs vs. Hypoplasia+Miopragia+VDs, H4: Hypoplasia+VDs vs. VDs, H5: Miopragia+VDs vs. VDs.
H6: Hypoplasia+Miopragia+VDs vs. VDs. The hypotheses have been sorted in descending order of the observed p-values.
^: statistically significant result.