Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Jun 9;15(8):573–584. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12152

Table 5. Performance of type-sensitive algorithms by race/ethnicity applied to the true cases (N=537) in the Carolina Data Warehouse for Health in 2011.

diabetes algorithms N*
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
PPV (%)
Total NHW Other Total NHW Other Total NHW Other Total NHW Other
Type 1 diabetes ≥1 type 1 codes 443 288 155 97.0 97.1 96.9 62.1 62.5 61.8 88.7 92.7 81.3

≥2 type 1 codes 415 276 139 93.6 94.2 92.3 72.7 69.6 75.0 91.3 93.8 86.3

0 type 2 codes and ≥1 type 1 codes 141 103 38 34.6 37.1 29.2 99.2 98.2 100.0 99.3 99.0 100.0

Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.3 413 277 136 96.8 96.7 96.9 84.1 80.4 86.8 94.9 96.0 92.6

Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.4 402 273 129 96.3 96.7 95.4 90.9 87.5 93.4 97.0 97.4 96.1

Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 397 269 128 95.6 96.0 94.6 92.4 91.1 93.4 97.5 98.1 96.1

Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.6 383 262 121 93.3 93.8 92.3 96.2 92.9 98.7 98.7 98.5 99.2

Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 and insulin use OR ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 and glucagon use 372 251 121 89.9 89.8 90.0 93.9 92.9 94.7 97.8 98.4 96.7

Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 and insulin use OR ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 and glucagon use OR DAA positive OR C-peptide negative 378 252 126 90.4 90.2 90.8 90.9 92.9 89.5 96.8 98.4 93.7

Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 OR ≥1 type 1 code and glucagon and no oral medications § OR ≥1 type 1 code and insulin and no oral medications § OR DAA positive OR C-peptide negative 412 276 136 96.5 96.7 96.2 84.1 82.1 85.5 94.9 96.4 91.9

Type 2 diabetes ≥1 type 2 codes 375 219 156 91.9 89.3 93.1 34.4 36.0 31.1 21.1 11.4 34.6

≥1 type 2 codes and 0 type 1 codes and no insulin use 57 23 34 46.5 35.7 51.7 96.2 95.7 97.3 70.2 43.5 88.2

Ratio of type 2 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.3 151 75 76 91.9 89.3 93.1 84.0 83.5 85.1 52.3 33.3 71.1

Ratio of type 2 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.4 138 65 73 91.9 89.3 93.1 86.9 86.8 87.2 57.2 38.5 74.0

Ratio of type 2 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 128 58 70 88.4 82.1 91.4 88.5 88.4 88.5 59.4 39.7 75.7

Ratio of type 2 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.6 116 51 65 84.9 75.0 89.7 90.5 90.1 91.2 62.9 41.2 80.0

0 type 1 codes and ≥3 type 2 codes and oral medications § 22 5 17 25.6 17.9 29.3 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Ratio of type 2 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.4 and oral medications § 78 27 51 70.9 71.4 70.7 96.2 97.7 93.2 78.2 74.1 80.4

Abbreviation: DAA, diabetes auto-antibodies; NHW, non-Hispanic white; PPV, positive predictive value.

True diabetes cases (N=537) and type confirmed by medical record review established our “gold standard” for evaluation of algorithms’ performance.

Only outpatient medications were included for analyses.

*

Number of youth captured;

Only 250.xx billing codes were used

The use of ratio was inspired by Klompas et al.’s study 24

§

Include metformin, sulfonylurea, GLP-1 receptor agonists, thiazolidinediones and other hypoglycemic agents, but not insulin and glucagon.