Table 5. Performance of type-sensitive algorithms by race/ethnicity applied to the true cases (N=537) in the Carolina Data Warehouse for Health in 2011.
| diabetes algorithms | N*
|
Sensitivity (%)
|
Specificity (%)
|
PPV (%)
|
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | NHW | Other | Total | NHW | Other | Total | NHW | Other | Total | NHW | Other | ||
| Type 1 diabetes | ≥1 type 1 codes† | 443 | 288 | 155 | 97.0 | 97.1 | 96.9 | 62.1 | 62.5 | 61.8 | 88.7 | 92.7 | 81.3 |
|
| |||||||||||||
| ≥2 type 1 codes | 415 | 276 | 139 | 93.6 | 94.2 | 92.3 | 72.7 | 69.6 | 75.0 | 91.3 | 93.8 | 86.3 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| 0 type 2 codes and ≥1 type 1 codes | 141 | 103 | 38 | 34.6 | 37.1 | 29.2 | 99.2 | 98.2 | 100.0 | 99.3 | 99.0 | 100.0 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.3†‡ | 413 | 277 | 136 | 96.8 | 96.7 | 96.9 | 84.1 | 80.4 | 86.8 | 94.9 | 96.0 | 92.6 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.4 | 402 | 273 | 129 | 96.3 | 96.7 | 95.4 | 90.9 | 87.5 | 93.4 | 97.0 | 97.4 | 96.1 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 | 397 | 269 | 128 | 95.6 | 96.0 | 94.6 | 92.4 | 91.1 | 93.4 | 97.5 | 98.1 | 96.1 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.6 | 383 | 262 | 121 | 93.3 | 93.8 | 92.3 | 96.2 | 92.9 | 98.7 | 98.7 | 98.5 | 99.2 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 and insulin use OR ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 and glucagon use | 372 | 251 | 121 | 89.9 | 89.8 | 90.0 | 93.9 | 92.9 | 94.7 | 97.8 | 98.4 | 96.7 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 and insulin use OR ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 and glucagon use OR DAA positive OR C-peptide negative | 378 | 252 | 126 | 90.4 | 90.2 | 90.8 | 90.9 | 92.9 | 89.5 | 96.8 | 98.4 | 93.7 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ratio of type 1 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 OR ≥1 type 1 code and glucagon and no oral medications § OR ≥1 type 1 code and insulin and no oral medications § OR DAA positive OR C-peptide negative | 412 | 276 | 136 | 96.5 | 96.7 | 96.2 | 84.1 | 82.1 | 85.5 | 94.9 | 96.4 | 91.9 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Type 2 diabetes | ≥1 type 2 codes | 375 | 219 | 156 | 91.9 | 89.3 | 93.1 | 34.4 | 36.0 | 31.1 | 21.1 | 11.4 | 34.6 |
|
| |||||||||||||
| ≥1 type 2 codes and 0 type 1 codes and no insulin use | 57 | 23 | 34 | 46.5 | 35.7 | 51.7 | 96.2 | 95.7 | 97.3 | 70.2 | 43.5 | 88.2 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ratio of type 2 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.3 | 151 | 75 | 76 | 91.9 | 89.3 | 93.1 | 84.0 | 83.5 | 85.1 | 52.3 | 33.3 | 71.1 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ratio of type 2 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.4 | 138 | 65 | 73 | 91.9 | 89.3 | 93.1 | 86.9 | 86.8 | 87.2 | 57.2 | 38.5 | 74.0 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ratio of type 2 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.5 | 128 | 58 | 70 | 88.4 | 82.1 | 91.4 | 88.5 | 88.4 | 88.5 | 59.4 | 39.7 | 75.7 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ratio of type 2 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.6 | 116 | 51 | 65 | 84.9 | 75.0 | 89.7 | 90.5 | 90.1 | 91.2 | 62.9 | 41.2 | 80.0 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| 0 type 1 codes and ≥3 type 2 codes and oral medications § | 22 | 5 | 17 | 25.6 | 17.9 | 29.3 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ratio of type 2 to type 1 and type 2 codes ≥ 0.4 and oral medications § | 78 | 27 | 51 | 70.9 | 71.4 | 70.7 | 96.2 | 97.7 | 93.2 | 78.2 | 74.1 | 80.4 | |
Abbreviation: DAA, diabetes auto-antibodies; NHW, non-Hispanic white; PPV, positive predictive value.
True diabetes cases (N=537) and type confirmed by medical record review established our “gold standard” for evaluation of algorithms’ performance.
Only outpatient medications were included for analyses.
Number of youth captured;
Only 250.xx billing codes were used
The use of ratio was inspired by Klompas et al.’s study 24
Include metformin, sulfonylurea, GLP-1 receptor agonists, thiazolidinediones and other hypoglycemic agents, but not insulin and glucagon.