Table 1.
Code-focused | Meaning-focused | |
---|---|---|
Teacher/child-managed, Whole class | The teacher is teaching the class how to decode multi-syllabic words by writing them on the white board and then demonstrating various strategies, such as looking for prefixes and suffixes.* | The teacher is reading A Single Shard to the class. She stops every so often to ask the students questions. |
Teacher/child-managed, Small group | The teacher is working with a small group of children on spelling (i.e., encoding) strategies. | The teacher and a small group of students are discussing Mr. Poppers’ Penguins and how it is similar and different from Charlotte's Web. |
Child/peer-managed, Small group and individual self-managed | Students are working together in pairs to complete a worksheet on dividing multi-syllabic words into syllables. | Students are working individually to revise an argumentative essay using feedback from their peers. |
Content areas (in the coding system) | Phonological Awareness Morphological Awareness* Word Identification/Decoding Word Identification/Encoding Grapheme/Phoneme correspondence Fluency* |
Print and Text Concepts Oral Language Print Vocabulary Listening and Reading Comprehension Text Reading Writing |
Note. It can be argued that morphological awareness (Carlisle, 2000) and fluency (Therrien, 2004) might also be considered meaning-focused activities. In our theory of literacy instruction, code-focused activities represent the more automatic processes whereas meaning-focused activities require the integration of the more automatic processes with active construction of meaning of connected text. Hence, code-focused activities are more likely to directly affect aspects of reading related to skill whereas meaning-focused activities are more likely to directly contribute to aspects of comprehension and reading for understanding.