Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 3;16(3):R58. doi: 10.1186/bcr3669

Table 5.

Analyses of potentially pathogenic groups of rare variants

Class Cases, n Controls, n Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Noncarriers
1,283
1,114
 
 
T + SJV¥
  MRE11A
1
0
 
 
  RAD50$
4
3
 
 
  NBN
4
0
 
 
Total
9
3
2.60 (0.70-9.65)
2.61 (0.67-10.1)
Any key functional domain rMS or in-frame indel*
  MRE11A¢
10
1
 
 
  RAD50
10
2
 
 
  NBN
4
2
 
 
Total
24
5
4.18 (1.59-11.0)
3.17 (1.17-8.59)
Key functional domain rMS (severity > C0) or in-frame indel*
  MRE11A¢
7
1
 
 
  RAD50
10
2
 
 
  NBN
3
1
 
 
Total
20
4
4.34 (1.48-12.7)
3.07 (1.01-9.31)
T + SJV¥ plus key functional domain rMS (severity > C0) or in-frame indel*
  MRE11A¢
8
1
 
 
  RAD50$
14
5
 
 
  NBN
7
1
 
 
Total 29 7 3.60 (1.57-8.24) 2.88 (1.22-6.78)

Boldface within the table indicates P <0.05. In these binary logistic regressions, the regression coefficient = ln(OR). ¥Truncating and splice junction variants; excludes final exon nonsense and frameshift variants. $One subject (a case) carried both the RAD50 splice acceptor variant RAD50_c.552-1G > A and the RAD50 silent substitution RAD50 c.3153G > A (p.L1051L). *The key functional domains are defined in Figure 1. The set of variants includes rare missense substitutions with A-GVGD scores > C0, and final exon nonsense and frameshift variants if they also fall in a key functional domain. ¢One subject (a case) carried both the MRE11A key domain rare missense substitution MRE11A p.D235G and the NBN non key domain rare missense substitution NBN p.V210F. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.