Skip to main content
. 2014 May 12;15:357. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-357

Table 3.

Validation of assembled contigs by re-sequencing using Sanger technology

ContigID
Best blastx
ORF complete?
Frameshifts
Contig length, bp
Checked by Sanger
Insertions
Deletions
Substitutions
% Discrepancy
  match   in ORF   sequencing, bp        
Contig3756
CENPS
yes
no
665
564
8
0
1
1.60%
Contig7869
Myc
yes
no
3,268
2,922
0
0
0
0.00%
Contig54848
HuD/Elav
yes
1
4,404
3,431
9
2
3
0.41%
Contig19303
Lgr5
both 5’ and 3’ ends are missing
no
1,510
1,510
0
0
0
0.00%
Contig40997
NeuroD
both 5’ and 3’ ends are missing
no
745
470
0
1
2
0.64%
Contig1064
NF1A
yes
no
5,279
3,825
3
9
1
0.34%
Contig32193
NvProtien1
5’ end is missing
no
2,411
1,986
0
1
0
0.05%
Contig51632
Oct
both 5’ and 3’ ends are missing
no
1,947
1947
0
0
0
0.00%
Contig46302
Piwi
yes
no
3,430
2,929
0
0
3
0.10%
Contig67140
Sox
yes
no
3,096
2,889
2
0
0
0.07%
Contig20197
unknown
NA
NA
1,339
1,252
2
0
0
0.16%
Contig68289
Wnt3
yes
no
2,561
990
2
0
2
0.40%
Contig50192
DCLK
yes
no
3,152
2,474
0
0
3
0.12%
Contig8186
Lhx
yes
no
5,430
3,041
0
0
5
0.16%
Contig3071
FoxJ1
yes
no
2,523
2,404
2
3
0
0.21%
Contig10179
Klf
yes
no
2,336
2,074
1
0
0
0.05%
      TOTAL: 44,096 34,708 29 16 20 0.19%
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure