Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 13.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;(7):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub2
Methods Cluster randomised multi-centre study (hospitals in and around Newcatle, Australia); F/U of 6 months
Participants N=450 (EX n=213; CON n=237)
71% male
Mean age: EX = 59 +/− 8, CON = 58 +/− 8 years
Diagnosis:
Ethnicity: NR
Inclusion: <70 years with a suspected heart attack registered by the Newcastle collaborating centre of the WHO MONICA Project and discharged alive from hospital
Exclusion: renal failure or other special dietary requirements and those considered by their physicians to have ‘endstage’ heart disease
Interventions Exercise group: 3 packages to participant -
1st package: Step 1“Facts on fat” kit, together with walking programmme information (also (encouragement to walk in the form of a magnetic reminder sticker), and “Quit for Life” program for smokers. 2nd package: Step 2-3 “Facts on fat” kit; exercise log. 3rd package: Step 4-5 “Facts on fat” kit, together with information regarding local “Walking for Pleasure” groups
Control group: usual care
Outcomes Total mortality, health-related quality of life: QLMI
Study outcomes assessed at 6 months
Notes Low use of preventative services (dietary, anti smoking) by both groups.
10% of patients received rehab - mostly having had CABG.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Cluster randomisation by GP.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear in terms of assessment of outcomes.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk 17% lost to follow up, no description of withdrawals or dropouts
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No information reported.