Methods | Randomised on day of discharge after MI; F/U 12-24 months. | |
Participants | N = 110 (EX n:57; CON n:53) Gender: NR Mean age: EX = 52.1 +/− 1.3, CON = 52.7 +/− 1.3 Diagnosis: <65 yrs with acute myocardial infarction confirmed by typical symptoms, electrocardiographic changes, and a rise in cardiac creatinine kinase isoenzyme Ethnicity: NR Inclusion: Men and women with acute myocardial infarction and had been admitted to Plymouth coronary care unit Exclusion: uncontrolled heart failure; serious rhythm disturbances which persisted and required treatment at time of discharge; another disabling disease |
|
Interventions | Exercise group: Duration: 4 weeks; Frequenty: 2 × week; Mode: standard pulse-monitored group exercise commonly used in the physiotherapy ofcardiac patients, 12 station circuit started 3 weeks post discharge Control: standard hospital care |
|
Outcomes | Total mortality, non fatal MI, revascularisation; Assessments at day ofdischarge, 3rd week after discharge; after rehabilitation (for intervention group); four months after infarct and 12-24 months after infarct) | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | “randomised” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk | Unclear in terms of assessment of outcomes. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
High risk | 24% lost to follow-up, no description of withdrawals or dropouts |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No information reported. |