Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 15;7(10):6679–6685.

Table 1.

Correlation between the expression of KLF4 protein and patients’ clinical characteristics

Pathological factors Case (N) expression of KLF4 protein x 2 value P value

Negative (55) Positive (43)
Gender
    Male 64 37 (57.8%) 27 (42.2%) 0.214 0.644
    Female 34 18 (52.9%) 16 (47.1%)
Age (yr)
    ≤60 50 32 (64.0%) 18 (36.0%) 3.442 0.064
    >60 48 23 (47.9%) 25 (52.1%)
The location of the tumor
    The upper esophagus 7 5 (71.4%) 2 (28.6%) 5.748 0.056
    Esophageal 65 31 (47.7%) 34 (52.3%)
    The lower esophagus 26 19 (73.1%) 7 (26.9%)
Tumor diameter (cm)
    <5 54 28 (51.9%) 26 (48.1%) 0.891 0.345
    ≥5 44 27 (61.4%) 17 (38.6%)
Differentiation degree
    I, I-II, II 87 49 (56.3%) 38 (43.7%) 0.013 0.911
    II-III, III 11 6 (54.5%) 5 (45.5%)
T Staging
    T1 8 3 (37.5%) 5 (62.5%) 1.479 0.477
    T2 19 10 (52.6%) 9 (47.4%)
    T3 71 42 (59.2%) 29 (40.8%)
Lymph node metastsis
    No 57 24 (42.1%) 33 (57.9%) 10.871 0.001
    Yes 41 31 (75.6%) 10 (24.4%)
TNM Staging
    Stage I 8 3 (37.5%) 5 (62.5%) 6.482 0.039
    Stage IIA-IIB 49 23 (46.9%) 26 (53.1%)
    Stage III 41 29 (70.7%) 12 (29.3%)