Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 15;7(10):6852–6861.

Table 3.

Classical pathological features and Microscopic findings of 69 cases of invasive beast carcinoma and their distribution over subtypes

Subtype

Characteristics Total Luminal A Luminal B HER2 ‘Basal like’
Histological type 69 42 24 1 2
    Invasive carcinoma of no special type 52 (75.4%) 31 (73.8%) 21 (87.5%) 0 0
        IDC 43 (62.3%) 26 (61.9%) 17 (70.8%) 0 0
        IDC with osteoclasitc giant cell 1 (1.4%) 1 (2.4%) 0 0 0
        IDC with invasive micropapillary 8 (11.6%) 4 (9.5%) 4 (16.7%) 0 0
    Invasive carcinoma of special subtypea 7 (10.1) 4 (9.5%) 1 (4.2%) 0 2 (100%)
        Invasive cribriform 1 (1.4%) 1 (2.4%) 0 0 0
        Metaplastic 1 (1.4%) 0 1 (4.2%) 0 0
        Mucinous 3 (4.4%) 3 (7.1%) 0 0 0
        Secretory 2 (2.9%) 0 0 0 2 (100%)
    Papillary carcinomab 6 (8.7%) 5 (11.9%) 1 (4.2%) 0 0
        Invasive papillary 1 (1.4%) 1 (2.4%) 0 0 0
        Encapsulated papillary 2 (2.9%) 2 (4.8%) 0 0 0
        Invasive solid papillary 3 (4.4%) 2 (4.8%) 1 (4.2%) 0 0
Mixed (ductal/mucinous) 4 (5.8%) 2 (4.8%) 1 (4.2%) 1 (100%) 0
Histological grade 69 42 24 1 2
    1 14 (20.3%) 11 (26.2%) 1 (4.2%) 0 2 (100%)
    2 45 (65.2%) 28 (66.7%) 16 (66.7%) 1 (100%) 0
    3 10 (14.5%) 3 (7.1%) 7 (29.2%) 0 0
Microscopic finding of tumor 69 42 24 1 2
    Ductal carcinoma in situ 28 (40.6%) 17 (40.5%) 10 (41.7%) 1 (100%) 0
    Necrosis 11 (15.9%) 7 (16.7%) 4 (16.7%) 0 0
    Sclerotic/Hyalined stroma 22 (31.9%) 14 (33.3%) 8 (33.3%) 0 0
    Calcification 7 (10.1%) 3 (7.1%) 3 (12.5%) 1 (100%) 0
Infiltration 65 40 22 1 2
    Dermis 14 (21.5%) 10 (25.0%) 4 (18.2%) 0 0
    Nipple 13 (20.0%) 6 (15.0%) 7 (31.8%) 0 0
Lymph node status 65 40 22 1 2
    Positive 26 (40.0%) 15 (37.5%) 11 (50.0%) 0 0
    Negative 39 (60.0%) 25 (62.5%) 11 (50.0%) 1 (100%) 2 (100%)
a

Invasive papillary carcinoma was categorized into papillary carcinoma other than invasive carcinoma of special subtype in this study.

b

Two cases of intraductal papillary carcinoma were excluded in this statistical evaluation.