Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 15;7(10):6644–6652.

Table 3.

Relationships between mean SWV ratio and clinicopathologic features of 143 invasive ductal cancers

Clinicopathologic features < 2.16 2.16-3.95 ≥ 3.95 Median SWV ratio
Agea
    < 50 (n = 28) 5 13 10 3.17
    ≥ 50 (n = 115) 20 55 40 3.88
Tumor sizeb
    < 10 mm (n = 11) 9 2 0 1.63
    10-20 mm (n = 53) 14 22 17 3.13
    ≥ 20 mm (n = 79) 2 29 48 4.29
Lymph nodal metastasisc
    Negative (n = 89) 20 37 32 3.43
    Positive (n = 54) 5 10 39 4.34
Histological graded
    Grade 1 (n = 12) 4 3 5 3.50
    Grade 2 (n = 86) 18 35 33 3.34
    Grade 3 (n = 45) 3 15 27 4.25
ER expressiona
    Negative (n = 59) 7 25 27 3.78
    Positive (n = 84) 18 28 38 3.72
PR expressiona
    Negative (n = 67) 9 28 30 3.82
    Positive (n = 76) 16 25 35 3.70
C-erbB-2 expressiona
    Negative (n = 39) 1 10 28 3.78
    Positive (n = 104) 14 41 49 3.76

ER: estrogen receptor, PR: C-erbB-2: progesterone receptor human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, SWV ratio (breast mass/adjacent breast tissue): shear wave velocity ratio.

a

P > 0.05;

b

P < 0.001;

c

P = 0.001;

d

P = 0.007.