Table 3.
Vector control decision making process: recommended response for the different risk levels
Risk area 1 | Risk level | Probability of human outbreak | Description | Recommended response |
---|---|---|---|---|
Predisposed |
1 |
Unknown |
Ecological condition suitable to WNV circulation AND past evidences of WNV circulation |
Consider drafting WNV preparedness plan |
Imperilled |
2 |
Unknown |
Ecological condition suitable to WNV circulation |
Develop WNV preparedness plan, including surveillance activities and an integrated vector control plan |
AND past evidences of WNV circulation |
Allocate resources necessary to enable emergency response |
|||
Implement larval control as part of the integrated vector control in case of WNV circulation in previous year | ||||
Imperilled |
3a |
Low |
Current surveillance findings (i.e. mosquito or birds screening) indicating WNV epizootic activity in the area, in the second part of the season (August-September-October) |
As in risk level 2 |
AND Implement public education programs focused on risk potential, personal protection, and emphasizing residential source reduction | ||||
Vector control focuses on larval control | ||||
Imperilled |
3b |
Low to moderate |
Current surveillance findings (i.e. mosquito or birds screening) indicating WNV epizootic activity in the area, in the first part of the season (May-June-July) |
As in risk level 3a |
AND increase entomological and bird surveillance | ||||
AND increase effort for public information on personal protection and continued source reduction | ||||
AND If surveillance indicates virus circulation is increasing initiate ground adult control in areas at high risk for humans or in hot spot sites (if known) | ||||
Imperilled |
4 |
High |
WNV specific IgM detected in local non vaccinated horse(s) or WNV isolated from local horse. |
As in risk level 3b |
If surveillance indicates virus circulation is increasing initiate ground adult control in areas at high risk for humans or in hot spot sites (if known) | ||||
Affected |
5 |
ongoing outbreak, uncertainty about size |
at least one human case detected (i.e. probable or confirmed human case according to EU case definition) |
Response as in level 4 |
AND intensify ground adult mosquito control with multiple applications in areas of high risk of human cases | ||||
AND enhance risk communication | ||||
AND monitor efficacy of spraying on target mosquito populations | ||||
AND in case a large area is involved coordinate the program by an emergency unit with all authorities involved |
1Nomenclature according to [106].