Table 1.
Normalisation of iodide efflux to processed CFTR protein
CFTR variant | Percentage processeda | Normalised processingb (%) | Normalised iodide effluxc (% peak response) | Iodide efflux to processed proteind (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Forskolin and genistein | ||||
WT | 92 ± 2 | 100 | 100 ± 11 | — |
G550E | 93 ± 4 | 101 | 150 ± 11e | 149 |
4RK | 85 ± 6 | 92 | 111 ± 9e | 121 |
G551D | 86 ± 8 | 93 | 51 ± 7 | 55 |
G550E-G551D | 85 ± 8 | 92 | 111 ± 13 | 121 |
4RK-G551D | 91 ± 5 | 99 | 119 ± 14 | 120 |
Forskolin and IBMX | ||||
WT | 92 ± 2 | 100 | 100 ± 7 | — |
G550E | 93 ± 4 | 101 | ND | ND |
4RK | 85 ± 6 | 92 | ND | ND |
G551D | 86 ± 8 | 93 | 15 ± 2 | 16 |
G550E-G551D | 85 ± 8 | 92 | 17 ± 2 | 18 |
4RK-G551D | 91 ± 5 | 99 | 37 ± 3 | 37 |
CFTR-mediated iodide efflux was evoked by treating BHK cells expressing CFTR variants with forskolin (10 μm) and either genistein (50 μm) or IBMX (100 μm). ND, not determined.
Percentage of CFTR protein processing given by [band C/(band B + band C) × 100].
Ratio of ‘Percentage processed’ value for each CFTR variant to the equivalent value for WT-CFTR.
CFTR-mediated iodide efflux expressed as % of maximum response relative to that of WT-CFTR.
Ratio of ‘Normalised iodide efflux’ value to the corresponding ‘Normalised processing’ value for a given CFTR variant.
Data are from Roxo-Rosa et al. (2006).