Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2014 May 13;285:158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.04.032

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of sub chronic EB treatment on object and place recognition.

A. In the sample trial (T1), exploration times (± S.E.M.) for the object and place tests are shown in vehicle- and EB-treated subjects (n=9/group). No significant differences. (B) In the recognition trial (T2), given 4 h post T1, entries are ratios (new/old + new) (± S.E.M.) of time spent exploring each object and objects in each location for vehicle- and EB-treated subjects. Dotted line at 0.5 indicates spending the same amount of time exploring new and old objects or locations. *** p < 0.001 (paired t-test within each group of old vs new). Figure reprinted with permission from Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (5).