Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 18;13:485. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-485

Table 1.

Tools, methods and description of information collected in the trial

Tool Method and frequency Description of data collected
Site assessment tool
• Completed by TTANGO Coordinators at baseline, and updated 6 monthly in all health services.
Broad description of:
(i) Clinical services and staffing
(ii) STI testing practices
(iii) Patient information system
(iv) Clinic setting as it relates to location of GeneXpert machine and consumables
Clinical data (quantitative)
• Collated from one or more of the following sources:
(i) Patient consultation data and associated demographics
(i) Health service patient information management systems
(ii) STI testing (point of care and laboratory), retesting and treatment outcomes
(ii) Laboratory data
• Extracted 3 monthly for all health services
Quality management data
• Services record results of EQA and forward to coordinators,
• External quality assurance and internal quality control test results
• twice during POC phase
• Temperature range of consumables during transport
• Internal quality control testing, once per month
• Multiple choice quiz and observed practice against competency standards
• Temperature monitoring of test consumables during transport
• Knowledge and competency assessment of staff following training in GeneXpert usage
Surveys (quantitative)
• Staff acceptability survey at end of POC phase
• Confidence using the test; satisfaction with training; trust in the results; ease of use; experience of discordant results; and impact on health service operations.
• Client acceptability survey, with attending clients in last month of POC phase
• Preference for testing modality (POC test vs conventional); convenience; satisfaction with test process and communication of results
In-depth interviews (qualitative)
• Stakeholders (national)
• Challenges and implications of introducing POC testing
• Stakeholders (national and international)
• Quality management and training considerations
  • Acceptability
  • Health service staff