Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sch Health. 2014 Dec;84(12):777–785. doi: 10.1111/josh.12209

Table 2.

Policies Banning the Advertising of Unhealthy Foods and Beverages in Minnesota Schools, 2008-2012

2008 N = 192 2010 N = 261 2012 N = 261 p*

Prevalence by school location (%)
    Building 61.0 63.2 61.2 .27
    Grounds 48.7 50.5 46.1 .01
    Buses 70.0 70.8 69.1 .46
    Publications 57.9 60.9 56.6 .02
Banned advertising score (mean)
    Overall 2.4 2.5 2.3 .07
    By school level
        Middle schools 2.8 2.9 2.7 .18
        High schools 2.2 2.3 2.2 .28
    By school location
        City 2.8 2.9 2.7 .23
        Suburban 2.7 2.8 2.7 .13
        Town/rural 2.2 2.3 2.2 .22
    By minority enrollment
        <20% 2.3 2.4 2.2 .18
        ≥20% 2.6 2.7 2.6 .32
    By free/reduced-price meal eligibility
        <40% 2.4 2.5 2.4 .16
        ≥40% 2.2 2.3 2.1 .52

All models include adjustment for school level, school geographic location, school minority enrollment (%), and free/reduced-price school meal eligibility (%).

Banned advertising score range: 0-4.

*

Represents testing for any change over time.