Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sch Health. 2014 Dec;84(12):777–785. doi: 10.1111/josh.12209

Table 3.

Percentage of Schools Implementing Environmental Strategies to Promote Healthy Food and Beverage Choices in Minnesota by School Demographic Characteristics, 2012

Price incentives for healthy foods (% of schools) Produce accessible near cashier (% of schools) Produce attractively displayed (% of schools) Appealing labels for healthy foods (% of schools) Healthy food and beverage promotion score (mean)

Overall 17.2 74.9 67.6 37.1 2.0
By school level
    Middle schools 11.1a 76.7 65.8 41.1 1.9
    High schools 19.7b 74.2 68.3 35.5 2.2
By school location
    City 24.0 88.0 72.0a,b 44.0 2.2a
    Suburban 20.3 88.9 84.4b 42.2 2.3a
    Town/rural 15.6 69.8 62.9a 35.0 1.7b
By minority enrollment
    <20% 18.3 70.6 65.0 37.8 2.1
    ≥20% 14.6 85.4 73.7 35.5 2.1
By free/reduced-price meal eligibility
    <40% 18.0 78.7a 71.2 38.6 2.2
    ≥40% 15.3 65.3b 58.3 33.3 1.9

All models include adjustment for school level, school geographic location, school minority enrollment (%), and free/reduced-price school meal eligibility (%).

Healthy food and beverage promotion score range: 0-4.

Different superscript letters (a,b) within columns indicate statistically significant differences, p < .05.