Table 4.

Associations of Advertising Policies and Healthy Food and Beverage Promotions with Efforts to Coordinate School Health Improvement in Minnesota Schools, 2012^†

	Banned advertising score		Healthy food and beverage promotion score
Coordination of school health improvement factor	β (SE)	p	β (SE)	p
Presence of school health coordinator	−0.31 (0.32)	.33	−0.07 (0.22)	.75
Completed self-assessment of the school nutrition environment	−0.07 (0.21)	.73	0.27 (0.15)	.07
Included nutrition objectives in the School Improvement Plan	0.26 (0.25)	.29	0.28 (0.17)	.10
Presence of school health council	0.19 (0.22)	.38	0.20 (0.15)	.19
Representation on the school health council	0.02 (0.02)	.37	0.03 (0.01)	.02
Activities performed by the school health council	0.07 (0.05)	.20	0.05 (0.04)	.15
Overall coordination score	0.02 (0.02)	.32	0.02 (0.01)	.02

^†All models include adjustment for school level, school geographic location, school minority enrollment (%), and free/reduced-price school meal eligibility (%).