Table 2.
anova on the timing of hatching (a) in Coregonus palaea and (b) in Coregonus albellus (notation as in Table1). In (b), some degrees of freedom were lost because of high mortality in some experimental cells.
| Factor | F | df | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| (a) C. palaea (Ntotal = 2055) | |||
| Treatment | 239.0 | 3 | <0.0001 |
| Dam | 64.8 | 3 | <0.0001 |
| Sire | 38.7 | 5 | <0.0001 |
| T × D | 11.6 | 9 | <0.0001 |
| T × S | 6.2 | 15 | <0.0001 |
| D × S | 4.2 | 15 | <0.0001 |
| (b) C. albellus excluding extra controls (Ntotal = 115) | |||
| Treatment | 0.4 | 4 | 0.80 |
| Dam | 19.3 | 1 | <0.0001 |
| Sire | 4.7 | 1 | 0.03 |
| T × D | 1.9 | 5 | 0.11 |
| T × S | 0.7 | 9 | 0.67 |
| D × S | 2.3 | 2 | 0.11 |
P-values linked to parent × treatment effects are emphasized in bold.