Effects of RNA binding energy and structure stability on sRNA efficiency. For each sequence variant we compare the change in local RNA stability or target binding free energy (kcal/mol) to sRNA repression/activation of its targets. (A–F) Variants of RyhB, (G–J) variants of DsrA. Seed interactions (A, B, G–H) are modeled as binding free energy of the sRNA-mRNA duplex. (A) RyhB-sodB (R2 = 0.62, N = 158), (B) RyhB-shiA (R2 = 0.42, N = 277), (G) DsrA-hns (R2 = 0.37, N = 35), (H) DsrA-rpoS (N = 60). Stem loop stability (C–F, I, J) is modeled by self-folding free energy. Stability of RyhB SL1 compared with regulation of (C) sodB (R2 = 0.46, N = 1223) and (D) shiA (R2 = 0.13, N = 792); stability of RyhB SL3 and regulation of (E) sodB (R2 = 0.57, N = 1089) and (F) shiA (R2 = 0.26, N = 908); stability of DsrA SL3 and regulation of (I) hns (R2 = 0.43, N = 2746) and (J) rpoS (R2 = 0.33, N = 2655). Variants carrying the mutation A30G are outlined with black circles in panel (C), and an arrow indicates m8, the variant that carries this mutation alone.