Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Environ Health Res. 2012 May 28;22(6):571–581. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2012.684147

Table 1.

Description of each home sampled for combustion-derived nanoparticles in Xuanwei and Fuyuan, China.

House Stove type Chimney present? Fuel type Duration of nanoparticle measurement (min) Average nanoparticle measurement (μm2/cm3) Average PM2.5 (μg/m3) Figure
1 High stove Yes Bituminous coal 1320 24.2 108.7
2 High stove Yes Bituminous coal 600 13.8 45.6
3 High stove Yes Bituminous coal 1230 27.2 142.3 1
4 Low stove Yes Bituminous coal 1020 144.3 254.0
5 Low stove Yes Bituminous coal 1050 21.7 131.0
6 Low stove Yes Bituminous coal 1290 34.0 97.4
7 Low stove Yes Bituminous coal 1260 17.7 66.1
8 Low stove Yes Bituminous coal 1200 61.6 108.2 2
9 Portable stove No Bituminous coal 1215 490.4 483.7
10 Portable stove No Anthracite coal 1215 216.9 95.2
11 Firepit No Bituminous coal 1290 131.7 588.7 3
12 High stove Yes Anthracite coal 780 46.0 33.1
13* Brick stove No Anthracite coal 435 269.1 72.6
14 Firepit and portable stove No Beehive** 717 104.9 122.3
15 Portable stove No Wood 1052 246.2 220.9 4

Notes:

*

sampling occurred during only one day;

**

a beehive is a honeycomb-shaped briquette.