Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications
. 2014 Oct 31;70(Pt 11):1563–1565. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X14013478

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase (SAHH) from Thermotoga maritima

Miao He a,, Yingying Zheng b,, Chun-Hsiang Huang b, Guojun Qian c, Xiansha Xiao b, Tzu-Ping Ko d, Weilan Shao c,*, Rey-Ting Guo b,*
PMCID: PMC4231867  PMID: 25372832

Thermophilic S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase (SAHH) from Thermotoga maritima (TmSAHH), which catalyzes the reversible conversion of S-adenosylhomocysteine into adenosine and homocysteine, was expressed in Escherichia coli and crystallized.

Keywords: thermostable enzyme, S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase, Thermotoga maritima

Abstract

S-Adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase (SAHH) catalyzes the reversible conversion of S-adenosylhomocysteine into adenosine and homocysteine. The SAHH from Thermotoga maritima (TmSAHH) was expressed in Escherichia coli and the recombinant protein was purified and crystallized. TmSAHH crystals belonging to space group C2, with unit-cell parameters a = 106.3, b = 112.0, c = 164.9 Å, β = 103.5°, were obtained by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method and diffracted to 2.85 Å resolution. Initial phase determination by molecular replacement clearly indicated that the crystal contains one homotetramer per asymmetric unit. Further refinement of the crystal structure is in progress.

1. Introduction  

S-Adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase (SAHH; EC 3.3.1.1) is an important and ubiquitous cellular enzyme in various living organisms. It catalyzes the reversible hydrolysis of S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) to adenosine and l-homocysteine (Palmer & Abeles, 1976, 1979). The reaction equilibrium favours the synthetic direction in vitro. Several human diseases, including cardiovascular disease (Zaina et al., 2005), white matter atrophy, delayed myelination, slowly progressive myopathy, retarded psychomotor development and mildly active chronic hepatitis (Honzík et al., 2012), have been found to be associated with deficiency of SAHH. In addition, studies of SAHH inhibitors have encouraged the design of antiviral (De Clercq, 2005) and antiparasitic drugs (Henderson et al., 1992; Bujnicki et al., 2003). In addition to physiological regulation, SAH has also been identified as having several pharmaceutical effects, including sedative, sleep modulating and anticonvulsant activities (Lozada-Ramírez et al., 2013).

Several SAHH structures from different organisms, including Homo sapiens (Turner et al., 1998; Yang et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2011), Rattus norvegicus (Hu et al., 1999; Takata et al., 2002; Huang et al., 2002; Yamada et al., 2005, 2007; Komoto et al., 2000), Plasmodium falciparum (Tanaka et al., 2004), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Reddy et al., 2008), Burkholderia pseudomallei (PDB entry 3d64; Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease, unpublished work), Trypanosoma brucei (PDB entry 3h9u; Structural Genomics Consortium, unpublished work), Leishmania major (PDB entry 3g1u; Structural Genomics Consortium, unpublished work) and Lupinus luteus (Brzezinski et al., 2012), have been solved. However, none of them is from a thermophilic microorganism. Enzymes from extremophiles have drawn much attention because they provide benefits in industrial applications, which usually involve harsh operating conditions (e.g. high salt or high temperature; Liszka et al., 2012). Moreover, thermostable enzymes often serve as models for studying catalytic mechanisms. Currently, the contributing factors and structural features responsible for the better thermal profiles of the thermophilic SAHHs remain unexplored and constitute a topic of great interest.

Recently, an SAHH has been identified from the anaerobic hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima (TmSAHH). Recombinant TmSAHH expressed in Escherichia coli shows optimal activity at pH 6.5 and 348 K (Lozada-Ramírez et al., 2013). The enzyme exhibits extreme thermostability and retains 95% enzyme activity after incubation at 348 K for 2 h. Therefore, TmSAHH is considered to have a high potential for development for commercial utilizations.

2. Materials and methods  

2.1. Protein preparation  

The gene encoding SAHH (GenBank AAC01562.1) from T. maritima MSB8 was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with forward primer 5′-CATGCCATGGCTAACACAGGTGAAATGAAGA-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CCGCTCGAGCTGCCAACTTCTCAGATA-3′. The PCR fragments encoding SAHH were digested with NcoI and XhoI, and ligated with NcoI/XhoI-digested pHsh (Shine-E, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China; Wu et al., 2010). An Ala residue is inserted right after the N-terminal Met and there are eight extra residues (LEHHHHHH) at the C-terminus, making a fusion protein of 413 residues (about 46 kDa). E. coli BL21-CodonPlus (DE3)-RIL (Novagen, USA) cells were transformed with the recombinant plasmid and the recombinant E. coli cell cultures were grown at 310 K to an OD600 of about 0.8; protein expression was then induced for 8 h by heat shock at 315 K. The cells from 0.8 l culture were then harvested by centrifugation (5000g, 10 min, 277 K), resuspended in 20 ml 5 mM imidazole, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.9 and disrupted with a French press at 1.25 × 105 kPa. Cell extracts were obtained by centrifugation for 1 h at 100 000g and 277 K using a Beckman L8-M ultracentrifuge (Beckman Instruments Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA). The cell extracts were heat-treated (353 K, 1 h), cooled in an ice bath and centrifuged (10 000g, 277 K, 30 min). The resulting supernatants were loaded onto a nickel-affinity column (Novagen) and eluted with 100 mM imidazole, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.9. The purification step was performed at 298 K in the presence of 0.02%(w/v) sodium azide, which was added to prevent microbial growth. The overall protein yield was 8 mg l−1. The protein was examined by SDS–PAGE and the protein bands were analyzed by density scanning with an image-analysis system (Bio-Rad). Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay.

2.2. Crystallization and data collection  

Initial crystallization screening was performed manually using 768 different reservoir conditions from Hampton Research (Laguna Niguel, California, USA), including Crystal Screen, Crystal Screen 2, Crystal Screen Cryo, Crystal Screen Lite, MembFac, Natrix, Index, SaltRx, SaltRx 2, PEG/Ion Screen, PEG/Ion 2 Screen, Quick Screen and six different Grid Screens (ammonium sulfate, 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol, sodium chloride, sodium malonate, PEG 6000 and PEG/LiCl) by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method. Prior to crystallization, TmSAHH was dialyzed against buffer consisting of 25 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl pH 7.5, 10 mM DTT and the protein was concentrated by centrifugation using Centriprep (Millipore, USA). All crystallization experiments were conducted at 295 K. In general, 2 µl TmSAHH-containing solution (10 mg ml−1 in 25 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl pH 7.5, 10 mM DTT) was mixed with 2 µl reservoir solution in 24-well Cryschem plates (Hampton Research) and equilibrated against 300 µl reservoir solution. Crystals of TmSAHH appeared within 4 d using Crystal Screen Lite condition No. 46 [0.2 M calcium acetate hydrate, 0.1 M sodium cacodylate trihydrate pH 6.5, 9%(w/v) polyethylene glycol 8000]. The condition was optimized to obtain better crystals using 0.3 M calcium acetate hydrate, 0.1 M sodium cacodylate trihydrate pH 6.5, 8%(w/v) polyethylene glycol 8000. Within 3–5 d, the crystals reached dimensions of about 0.5 × 0.07 × 0.07 mm. Prior to flash-cooling at 100 K, crystals were soaked in a reservoir-based cryoprotectant consisting of 0.4 M calcium acetate hydrate, 0.2 M sodium cacodylate trihydrate pH 6.5, 15%(w/v) polyethylene glycol 8000, 17%(w/v) glycerol for about 3 s. Subsequently, a crystal was mounted in a cryoloop and flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen. An X-ray diffraction data set was collected to 2.85 Å resolution on beamline BL13C1 of the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC), Hsinchu, Taiwan. The diffraction data were processed using HKL-2000 (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997). Data-collection statistics are given in Table 1.

Table 1. Data-collection statistics for the TmSAHH crystal.

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.

Beamline BL-13C1, NSRRC
Wavelength () 0.97622
Resolution () 25.002.85 (2.952.85)
Space group C2
Unit-cell parameters
a () 106.3
b () 112.0
c () 164.9
() 103.5
No. of measured reflections 148719 (14160)
No. of unique reflections 43417 (4291)
Completeness (%) 99.4 (98.9)
R merge (%) 9.7 (50.7)
R meas (%) 11.5 (60.5)
R p.i.m. § (%) 6.2 (32.6)
Mean I/(I) 15.2 (2.4)
Multiplicity 3.4 (3.3)
Detector Q315r
X-ray beam size (m) 200
Oscillation range () 0.5
Time of exposure (s) 40
Crystal-to-detector distance (mm) 350

R merge = Inline graphic.

R meas = Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic.

§

R p.i.m. = Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic.

3. Results and discussion  

As shown in Fig. 1, the single TmSAHH crystal obtained under the optimized condition was rod-shaped. Based on the diffraction pattern (Fig. 2), the TmSAHH crystal belongs to the C-centred monoclinic space group C2, with unit-cell parameters a = 106.3, b = 112.0, c = 164.9 Å, β = 103.5°. Assuming the presence of four molecules per asymmetric unit, the Matthews coefficient V M (Matthews, 1968) is 2.65 Å3 Da−1 and the estimated solvent content is 53.6%.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A crystal of TmSAHH. The dimensions of the crystal reached 0.5 × 0.07 × 0.07 mm after 3–5 d.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A typical diffraction pattern of the TmSAHH crystal.

The structure of TmSAHH was solved by the molecular-replacement method with Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007) from the CCP4 suite (Winn et al., 2011) using a hypothetical TmSAHH model as the search model. This model was generated from the structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis SAHH (PDB entry 3dhy; 43% sequence identity; Reddy et al., 2008) using the Phyre2 server (Kelley & Sternberg, 2009). Preliminary structural refinement using REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al., 2011) and CNS (Brunger, 2007) resulted in an R work and R free of 39 and 44%, respectively. There are four monomers in the asymmetric unit and these four monomers form a homotetramer, which is consistent with previously solved SAHH structures (Lee et al., 2011; Reddy et al., 2008; Tanaka et al., 2004; Brzezinski et al., 2012). Further refinement of the crystal structure is under way. To fully understand the substrate-binding modes and catalytic mechanism, cocrystallization and soaking of the TmSAHH crystals with its substrates S-adenosylhomocysteine, adenosine and homocysteine are also in progress.

Acknowledgments

The synchrotron data collection was conducted on beamline BL13C1 of the NSRRC (National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, Taiwan) supported by the National Science Council (NSC). This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31200053 and 31300615) and the Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission (12ZCZDSY12500).

References

  1. Brunger, A. T. (2007). Nature Protoc. 2, 2728–2733. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Brzezinski, K., Dauter, Z. & Jaskolski, M. (2012). Acta Cryst. D68, 218–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Bujnicki, J. M., Prigge, S. T., Caridha, D. & Chiang, P. K. (2003). Proteins, 52, 624–632. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. De Clercq, E. (2005). Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, 24, 1395–1415. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Henderson, D. M., Hanson, S., Allen, T., Wilson, K., Coulter-Karis, D. E., Greenberg, M. L., Hershfield, M. S. & Ullman, B. (1992). Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 53, 169–183. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Honzík, T., Magner, M., Krijt, J., Sokolová, J., Vugrek, O., Belužić, R., Barić, I., Hansíkova, H., Elleder, M., Veselá, K., Bauerová, L., Ondrušková, N., Ješina, P., Zeman, J. & Kožich, V. (2012). Mol. Genet. Metab. 107, 611–613. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Hu, Y., Komoto, J., Huang, Y., Gomi, T., Ogawa, H., Takata, Y., Fujioka, M. & Takusagawa, F. (1999). Biochemistry, 38, 8323–8333. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Huang, Y., Komoto, J., Takata, Y., Powell, D. R., Gomi, T., Ogawa, H., Fujioka, M. & Takusagawa, F. (2002). J. Biol. Chem. 277, 7477–7482. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Kelley, L. A. & Sternberg, M. J. (2009). Nature Protoc. 4, 363–371. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Komoto, J., Huang, Y., Gomi, T., Ogawa, H., Takata, Y., Fujioka, M. & Takusagawa, F. (2000). J. Biol. Chem. 275, 32147–32156. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Lee, K. M., Choi, W. J., Lee, Y., Lee, H. J., Zhao, L. X., Lee, H. W., Park, J. G., Kim, H. O., Hwang, K. Y., Heo, Y.-S., Choi, S. & Jeong, L. S. (2011). J. Med. Chem. 54, 930–938. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Liszka, M. J., Clark, M. E., Schneider, E. & Clark, D. S. (2012). Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 3, 77–102. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Lozada-Ramírez, J. D., Sánchez-Ferrer, A. & García-Carmona, F. (2013). Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 170, 639–653. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  16. Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  17. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Palmer, J. L. & Abeles, R. H. (1976). J. Biol. Chem. 251, 5817–5819. [PubMed]
  19. Palmer, J. L. & Abeles, R. H. (1979). J. Biol. Chem. 254, 1217–1226. [PubMed]
  20. Reddy, M. C., Kuppan, G., Shetty, N. D., Owen, J. L., Ioerger, T. R. & Sacchettini, J. C. (2008). Protein Sci. 17, 2134–2144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  21. Takata, Y., Yamada, T., Huang, Y., Komoto, J., Gomi, T., Ogawa, H., Fujioka, M. & Takusagawa, F. (2002). J. Biol. Chem. 277, 22670–22676. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. Tanaka, N., Nakanishi, M., Kusakabe, Y., Shiraiwa, K., Yabe, S., Ito, Y., Kitade, Y. & Nakamura, K. T. (2004). J. Mol. Biol. 343, 1007–1017. [DOI] [PubMed]
  23. Turner, M. A., Yuan, C. S., Borchardt, R. T., Hershfield, M. S., Smith, G. D. & Howell, P. L. (1998). Nature Struct. Biol. 5, 369–376. [DOI] [PubMed]
  24. Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242.
  25. Wu, H., Pei, J., Jiang, Y., Song, X. & Shao, W. (2010). Biotechnol. Lett. 32, 795–801. [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Yamada, T., Komoto, J., Lou, K., Ueki, A., Hua, D. H., Sugiyama, K., Takata, Y., Ogawa, H. & Takusagawa, F. (2007). Biochem. Pharmacol. 73, 981–989. [DOI] [PubMed]
  27. Yamada, T., Takata, Y., Komoto, J., Gomi, T., Ogawa, H., Fujioka, M. & Takusagawa, F. (2005). Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 37, 2417–2435. [DOI] [PubMed]
  28. Yang, X., Hu, Y., Yin, D. H., Turner, M. A., Wang, M., Borchardt, R. T., Howell, P. L., Kuczera, K. & Schowen, R. L. (2003). Biochemistry, 42, 1900–1909. [DOI] [PubMed]
  29. Zaina, S., Lindholm, M. W. & Lund, G. (2005). J. Nutr. 135, 5–8. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Acta Crystallographica. Section F, Structural Biology Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES