TABLE 4.
Log SI |
Log DI |
||||
Independent variable | n | β ± SEM | P value | β ± SEM | P value |
15:0 | |||||
Model 12 | 659 | 0.689 ± 0.370 | 0.06 | 1.763 ± 0.895 | 0.049 |
Model 23 | 645 | 0.909 ± 0.382 | 0.018 | 2.205 ± 0.927 | 0.018 |
Model 34 | 645 | 0.844 ± 0.381 | 0.027 | 2.212 ± 0.931 | 0.018 |
Model 45 | 644 | 0.504 ± 0.334 | 0.13 | 1.628 ± 0.881 | 0.07 |
trans 16:1n−7 | |||||
Model 12 | 659 | −0.556 ± 0.214 | 0.010 | −0.264 ± 0.520 | 0.61 |
Model 23 | 645 | −0.439 ± 0.225 | 0.05 | 0.078 ± 0.546 | 0.89 |
Model 34 | 645 | −0.415 ± 0.223 | 0.06 | 0.096 ± 0.548 | 0.86 |
Model 45 | 644 | −0.375 ± 0.195 | 0.05 | 0.137 ± 0.516 | 0.79 |
DI, disposition index; SI, insulin sensitivity index.
Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and center.
Model 2: additionally adjusted for physical activity, smoking status, alcohol intake, and education.
Model 3: additionally adjusted for total energy, fruit and vegetable, red meat, soft drink, and fiber intakes.
Model 4: additionally adjusted for BMI.