TABLE 3—
Bivariate Associations of Work Organization With Health Indicators for Latina Woman Manual Workers (n = 319): Western North Carolina, 2010
| Job Demands |
Decision Latitude |
Supporta |
||||||||||||
| Health Indicators | Heavy Load, Ratio (95% CI) or Mean ±SE | P | Awkward Posture, Ratio (95% CI) or Mean ±SE | P | Psychological Demand, Ratio (95% CI) or Mean ±SE | P | Skill Variety, Ratio (95% CI) or Mean ±SE | P | Job Control, Ratio (95% CI) or Mean ±SE | P | Perceived Supervisor Control, Ratio (95% CI) or Mean ±SE | P | Work Safety Climate, Ratio (95% CI) or Mean ±SE | P |
| Musculoskeletal symptoms, location,b PR | ||||||||||||||
| Neck | 1.43 (0.86, 2.38) | 1.49 (1.10, 2.01) | 1.30 (1.00, 1.69) | 0.93 (0.65, 1.32) | 0.87 (0.65, 1.16) | 1.06 (0.64, 1.74) | 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) | |||||||
| Upper or lower back | 1.54 (1.14, 2.07) | 1.21 (1.00, 1.45) | 1.37 (1.16, 1.61) | 0.88 (0.71, 1.08) | 0.76 (0.61, 0.95) | 1.19 (0.80, 1.65) | 1.01 (0.96, 1.06) | |||||||
| Forearms | 1.53 (1.11, 2.10) | 1.29 (1.06, 1.58) | 1.44 (1.20, 1.73) | 0.74 (0.57, 0.96) | 0.82 (0.67, 1.01) | 1.26 (0.87, 1.81) | 1.02 (0.96, 1.08) | |||||||
| Wrists or hands | 1.31 (0.95, 1.81) | 1.49 (1.28, 1.73) | 1.44 (1.24, 1.67) | 0.86 (0.69, 1.06) | 0.76 (0.62, 0.93) | 1.12 (0.82, 1.53) | 0.98 (0.94, 1.03) | |||||||
| Shoulders | 1.34 (0.99, 1.80) | 1.32 (1.09, 1.58) | 1.32 (1.13, 1.55) | 0.86 (0.70, 1.06) | 0.96 (0.80, 1.15) | 1.23 (0.86, 1.76) | 1.03 (0.98, 1.09) | |||||||
| Elbows | 0.92 (0.34, 2.48) | 2.16 (1.38, 3.38) | 1.93 (1.13, 3.29) | 0.72 (0.41, 1.27) | 0.42 (0.24, 0.74) | 0.68 (0.31, 1.51) | 0.94 (0.85, 1.05) | |||||||
| No. of musculoskeletal symptoms,c OR | < .01 | < .01 | < .01 | .01 | .02 | .45 | .2 | |||||||
| 1–3 vs none | 2.50 (1.32, 4.72) | 1.98 (1.43, 2.75) | 1.84 (1.39, 2.44) | 0.61 (0.44, 0.84) | 0.74 (0.58, 0.96) | 0.99 (0.60, 1.64) | 0.93 (0.97, 1.00) | |||||||
| 4–6 vs none | 2.72 (1.24. 5.93) | 2.38 (1.57, 3.59) | 2.37 (1.59, 3.55) | 0.71 (0.46, 1.08) | 0.64 (0.41, 0.98) | 1.55 (0.73, 3.29) | 0.99 (0.90, 1.11) | |||||||
| Depression (CES-D)b | 1.54 ±0.69 | .02 | 1.47 ±0.39 | <. 01 | 0.82 ±0.31 | < .01 | –0.75 ±0.38 | .04 | 0.08 ±0.29 | .78 | –1.32 ±0.58 | .02 | –0.21 ±0.08 | <.01 |
| Health-related quality of lifed | ||||||||||||||
| SF-12 PCS | –0.24 ±0.80 | .76 | –0.82 ±0.49 | .09 | 0.00 ±0.40 | .99 | 0.76 ±0.50 | .13 | 0.18 ±0.49 | .71 | –0.47 ±0.84 | .57 | 0.19 ±0.12 | .09 |
| SF-12 MCS | –1.63 ±1.33 | .22 | –1.33 ±0.70 | .05 | –1.64 ±0.58 | < .01 | 1.27 ±0.70 | .07 | 1.06 ±0.51 | .03 | 2.20 ±1.01 | .02 | 0.35 ±0.16 | .02 |
Note. CES-D = Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale; CI = confidence interval; MCS = mental component score; OR = odds ratio; PCS = physical component score; PR = prevalence ratio. The organization of work indicators are not standardized; therefore, the associations presented are for a 1-unit change in the independent variable.
Excludes self-employed; for perceived supervisor control n = 273; for work safety climate n = 269.
Relative risk regression models with Score test.
Nominal logistic region models with Wald χ2 test.
Linear regression models with F test.