Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 14;9(11):e111554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111554

Table 4. T-values for the comparison between the numbers of positive and negative connections that time-lag made more significance.

-S-G +S+G +S-G -S+G rats
0 2.90369E-26 2.99046E-13 1.57702E-26 1.69953E-11 1.66596E-10
2 8.40016E-06 0.800385948 7.38712E-07 0.450100779 3.91086E-11
4 0.000407685 2.44899E-06 0.012682339 0.004888566 0.001371955
6 4.73828E-08 9.33376E-07 7.36576E-05 0.000790463 0.811502824
8 2.60049E-07 6.57005E-06 0.001934496 4.07728E-05 0.002860986
10 3.48352E-09 8.16819E-05 0.000272562 0.003190054 0.000538446
12 3.2188E-08 0.000238064 1.03808E-05 0.001122026 0.001629137
14 9.87039E-09 0.000522939 0.000942835 0.000260738 1.8236E-06
16 1.95238E-12 1.99754E-05 7.12566E-06 0.017933245 0.001564497
18 3.14229E-08 1.52653E-05 4.45951E-05 0.006811102 1.2003E-05
20 1.38689E-08 9.0614E-05 0.001227115 0.004817849 0.000457931
22 5.55054E-08 5.0776E-07 3.7641E-05 0.000158922 0.000431086
24 3.93325E-07 1.33919E-06 0.000267121 0.000903292 9.5524E-05
26 1.12124E-06 0.001065601 0.000725739 0.000401245 9.63E-06

More significance positive/negative connections were defined as connections with higher/lower Fisher transform values. Comparison was done for each time-lag and for the four human analyses as well as for the rat data. The rows are for different time-lags that are given is sec.