Table 2. GWA scan results for protein and oil.
MS-1996 (728)a |
MS-2000 (934) |
IL-1964 (619) |
IL-1966 (977) |
Huang et al. 2014 (214) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNP | -log (p-value)b | Allelic Effect Estimate | SNP | -log (p-value) | Allelic Effect Estimate | SNP | -log (p-value) | Allelic Effect Estimate | SNP | -log (p-value) | Allelic Effect Estimate | SNP | -log (p-value) | Allelic Effect Estimate |
% Protein (43.45 [43.50])c ; H2 = 0.65 (MS-1966), 0.80 (MS-2000), 0.52 (IL-1964), 0.79 (IL-1966), 0.88 (Hwang 2014) | ||||||||||||||
12_38378352d,e | 4.85 (4.69) | 0.6 | 20_31972955 | 10.63 (10.43) | 1.38 | 8_44632488 | 4.4 (4.37) | 0.44 | 13_24858209 | 4.75 (4.12) | 0.39 | 20_31610452 | 5.99 (5.98) | 1.49 |
17_2678979 | 4.03 (4.61) | 0.63 | 12_34729290 | 4.94 (4.11) | 0.66 | 11_37932701 | 4.68 (5.08) | 0.41 | ||||||
15_3919945 | 4.35 (4.24) | 0.28 |
% Oil (18.60 [18.45]); H2 = 0.66 (MS-1966), 0.88 (MS-2000), 0.73 (IL-1964), 0.78 (IL-1966), 0.91 (Hwang 2014) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15_12490330 | 6.43 (6.9) | 0.34 | 20_31150279 | 13.33 (15.02) | 1.06 | 20_613396 | 6.51 (6.56) | 0.46 | 12_39580013 | 6.32 (5.6) | 0.22 | 20_31150279 | 5.27 (5.2) | 0.71 |
6_46040638 | 4.72 (5.32) | 0.28 | 15_3919945 | 8.15 (8.04) | 0.48 | 15_3702534 | 7.83 (5.8) | 0.72 | 6_10324739 | 4.67 (4.5) | 0.28 | 16_7253088 | 4.54 (4.64) | 0.62 |
7_35214966 | 5.11 (4.6) | 0.57 | 5_38495217 | 6.74 (8.39) | 0.78 | 11_11633102 | 4.56 (5.78) | 0.61 | 4_2052748 | 4.51 (4.61) | 0.33 | |||
5_38495217 | 4.88 (4.6) | 0.28 | 6_42907701 | 5.7 (4.31) | 0.26 | 14_10300717 | 4.49 (4.33) | 0.36 | ||||||
16_510565 | 4.64 (4.81) | 0.44 | 8_2969485 | 4.45 (5.1) | 0.5 | |||||||||
15_3828587 | 4.49 (4.33) | 0.36 | ||||||||||||
4_9617727 | 4.22 (4.42) | 0.51 |
Population used; value in parentheses is the number of genotypes used.
Value from MLMM; parenthetical value from CMLM.
Mean values for combined populations are in parentheses with median values in brackets.
Bold font indicates that the marker (or a marker within 4 Mbp) was associated with the trait in two or more environment–population datasets.
Italic font indicates that the marker (or a marker within 4 Mbp) was also associated with another trait in the study.