Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 28;54(6):1372–1384. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0357-0

Table 3.

Percentage of slope-units in the susceptibility classes computed for the different susceptibility zonation

<0.20 (%) 0.20–0.45 (%) 0.45–0.55 (%) 0.55–0.80 (%) >0.80 (%)
Land use 2009 28.2 (15.3) 18.9 (23.7) 7.6 (10.2) 18.9 (24.5) 26.5 (26.19)
Land use 1954 29.0 (16.5) 26.5 (35.65) 6.7 (13.8) 23.1 (18.8) 14.7 (15.1)
Scenario 1 31.1 (21.4) 21.4 (25.8) 6.3 (6.2) 15.5 (14.7) 25.5 (31.8)
Scenario 2 31.1 (21.4) 22.7 (28.5) 8.0 (8.4) 16.8 (17.4) 21.4 (24.3)
Scenario 3 39.5 (30.4) 30.7 (34.0) 7.1 (8.5) 17.6 (17.5) 5.0 (9.6)

The first digit is the percentage of number of SU, the second the percentage of the area (maps and success rate graphs shown in Figs. 4, 6). In the table, we consider only the model results obtained with the 2 % threshold