Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Dec;28(12):e273–e280. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000123

Table 3.

Gait analysis, muscle strength, and leg length discrepancy

Salvage arthroplasty (HA/THA) (N=19) Internal Fixation (N=77) P-value
Gait velocity (m/s)1 1.0 (0.6–1.2) 1.2 (1.1–1.5) 0.413
Stance time (% of gait cycle)1§b −1.8 (−5.2–0.1) −1.6 (−3.8– −0.1) 0.446
Single support phase (% of gait cycle)1§b −2.2 (−4.0– −0.2) −0.5 (−4.4–1.0) 0.554
Double support phase (% of gait cycle)1§b −0.3 (−1.7–1.1) 0.2 (−2.1–2.6) 0.545
Step length (cm)1§ 1.8 (−1.5–4.1) 0.0 (−3.2–3.8) 0.249
Foot axis (°)1§ −2.3 (−10.2–9.0) 0.6 (−5.1–4.9) 0.402
COP ΔY (cm)1§ −8.9 (−13.0– −1.8) 0.4 (−8.1–6.8) 0.013
VAS score satisfaction with gait pattern1 7.1 (4.7–8.5) 7.4 (5.0–8.7) 0.847
Flexion (N)1§ −18.6 (−41.1–9.3) −1.3 (−13.5–4.1) 0.108
Extension (N)1§ −14.1 (−37.5–6.2) −3.5 (−26.9–13.2) 0.226
Adduction (N)1§ −6.9 (−26.0–11.6) −2.8 (−29.3–19.0) 0.713
Abduction (N)1§ −25.4 (−67.5– −17.8) −20.4 (−35.0–0.7) 0.025
LLD (cm)1 0.0 (−0.8–1.0) 0.8 (0.3–1.8) 0.001
Feeling of LLD2 3 (16) 31 (40) 0.061
VAS score complaints LLD1a 4.9 (2.6–6.0) 4.0 (1.5–7.2) 0.813
Heel lift use2 1 (5) 23 (30) 0.036

HA, Hemiarthroplasty; THA, Total Hip Arthroplasty; LLD, Leg Length Discrepancy; VAS, Visual Analog Scale; COP, Center of Pressure line

Differences between groups were tested with the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and with the Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.

1

Data are presented as median with P25-P75 given between brackets.

2

Data are presented as number with percentages.

a

The VAS score for complaints as a result of a LLD was only measured in the 34 patients that indicated having the feeling of a LLD.

b

These variables had >10% missing data, because they require a completely measured gait cycle for both legs, which was often not feasible (Stance Time 14% missing and Single/Double Support Phase 54%).

§

The values displayed for these variables represent the difference between the two legs (Parameter fractured leg – Parameter contralateral leg).

A negative value therefore represents a decrease in the fractured leg, a positive value an increase.