Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8;(9):CD007396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007396.pub2

Comparison 5. Tramadol versus pethidine.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pain intensity: women with poor pain relief 4 243 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.56 [1.10, 2.21]
2 Additional analgesia required 3 295 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 1.07 [0.60, 1.91]
3 Nausea and vomiting 6 454 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.34, 2.76]
4 Maternal sleepiness 5 409 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.57 [0.33, 0.97]
5 Assisted vaginal delivery 3 260 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.12, 2.56]
6 Caesarean section 3 260 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.23, 2.18]
7 Low Apgar scores (≤ 7) at 1 and 5 minutes 2 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
   7.1 Low scores at 1 minute 2 250 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
   7.2 Low scores at 5 minutes 1 160 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
8 Neonatal resuscitation 1 90 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
9 Neonatal respiratory distress 1 59 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.26 [0.64, 7.89]
10 Admission to NICU 1 59 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.26 [0.64, 7.89]