Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 29;14:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-103

Table 4.

Statistics of QTL that interact with sex

 
 
 
Position
Flanking markers c
am + dm + im d
am + dm e
am f
Chr Trait a Groups (cM) b Left Right P -value %var P -value % var P -value % var
1
Soleus
pQTL
19
rs3696088
rs13472794
1.57E-06
2.94
3.28E-01
0.23
5.05E-01
0.05
1
Pec
pQTL
23
rs3696088
rs13472794
1.23E-03
1.45
5.64E-03
0.95
7.01E-04
1.07
1
Edl
pQTL
89
rs3666905
rs13476312
1.65E-02
1.03
3.48E-01
0.21
1.68E-01
0.19
2
P
tQTL
34
rs6268714
rs13476554
1.18E-02
1.53
3.73E-03
1.55
2.04E-01
0.23
3
Pec
pQTL
36
rs13477132
rs13477174
1.90E-02
0.99
8.37E-02
0.50
2.39E-02
0.51
3
Edl
pQTL
64
rs3663873
rs13477430
4.79E-02
0.80
2.09E-02
0.78
4.70E-01
0.05
6
EGF
eQTL
32
rs13478839
rs4226048
4.18E-03
1.79
2.08E-03
1.67
4.85E-04
1.64
6
Fat
pQTL
10
petM-02094-1
rs3678887
3.61E-02
0.86
2.06E-02
0.78
3.46E-01
0.09
6
AI
pQTL
11
petM-02094-1
rs3678887
6.05E-02
0.73
3.85E-02
0.65
5.31E-01
0.04
7
Pec
pQTL
47
rs3676254
rs3656205
5.61E-03
1.25
2.84E-03
1.16
3.39E-03
0.85
9
Fat
pQTL
15
rs3719607
rs8259427
2.31E-02
0.95
1.02E-02
0.92
4.53E-01
0.06
9
AI
pQTL
15
rs3719607
rs8259427
3.50E-02
0.85
1.61E-02
0.82
5.38E-01
0.04
11
AI
pQTL
14
rs6276300
rs6199956
3.29E-02
0.87
4.53E-02
0.62
4.35E-02
0.41
11
Fat
pQTL
15
rs6276300
rs6199956
3.75E-02
0.85
4.80E-02
0.61
3.65E-02
0.44
11
Gastro
pQTL
24
rs6276300
rs6199956
3.00E-04
1.90
1.77E-04
1.74
3.23E-05
1.74
11
BMI
pQTL
49
rs13481054
rs3701609
1.44E-01
0.54
6.64E-02
0.54
2.85E-02
0.48
14
BMI
pQTL
65
rs3709178
rs13482404
1.54E-02
1.03
1.16E-01
0.43
5.64E-01
0.03
17
Gastro
pQTL
11
rs13482893
rs3719497
1.15E-01
0.59
5.29E-02
0.59
1.67E-02
0.57
17
AI
pQTL
13
rs13482893
rs3719497
5.86E-02
0.73
2.56E-02
0.72
4.15E-02
0.41
17 Fat pQTL 13 rs13482893 rs3719498 4.83E-02 0.78 2.11E-02 0.77 4.19E-02 0.41

aTrait abbreviations are the same as in Table 1. P: total protein.

bPeak position of QTL detected in Kosambi centimorgans.

cFlanking markers (left and right) of the QTL peak. See Additional file 1: Table S6 for marker information.

dam + dm + im tested the overall interaction, which included additive, dominance, and imprinted pQTL by sex interactions. P-value < 0.05 is shown in italics %var: percentage of phenotypic variance accounted for at QTL position.

eam + dm tested for non-imprinted interactions, which included additive and dominance pQTL by sex interactions. P-value < 0.05 is shown in italics %var: percentage of phenotypic variance accounted for at QTL position.

fam tested the additive interaction, which included additive pQTL by sex interactions. P-value < 0.05 is shown in italics %var: percentage of phenotypic variance accounted for at QTL position.