Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 6;11(99):20140543. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0543

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Hagen–Poiseuille shear stress in inclined cylinders of Inline graphic. Norm of the analytical and computed stress tensors (panels 4a,c,e) and relative error between them (panels 4b,d,f). Results are presented for every lattice site with radius Inline graphic. Agreement between computed and analytical solution improves with increasing Inline graphic. These results, with the Bouzidi et al. [50] implementation of the no-slip boundary condition, represent a substantial improvement over the 35% error reported by Stahl et al. [51] with the bounce-back method and Inline graphic. (Online version in colour.)