Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 17;111(42):714–720. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0714

Table. Overview of commonly used modern modes of ventilation, based on the authors' clinical and scientific experience.

Mode Principle Advantages Disadvantages
HFOV
  • Low tidal volumes

    (1–2 mL/kgBW)

  • High respiratory rate (up to 12 Hz)

  • Higher mean airway pressure with relatively low peak pressures

  • Alveolar recruitment

  • Lower shearing forces in the lungs

  • Need for more analgesia/sedation

  • Hemodynamic impairment due to elevated intrathoracic pressure

  • Possibly increased mortality of ARDS patients

PAV
  • Proportional pressure support by means of compensation for individual resistance and compliance

  • Better synchrony with ventilator

  • Better oxygenation and pulmonary mechanics

  • Risk of "runaway,” especially with pathological breathing patterns

  • Frequent adjustment needed if resistance and/or compliance varies

  • Optimal setting is time-consuming

PAV+
  • Automatic resistance and compliance measurement, with automatic adjustment of settings

  • Simplified setting of parameters with the aid of automatic measurement of resistance and compliance

  • Risk of "runaway,” especially with pathological breathing patterns

NAVA
  • Proportional pressure support through measurement and reinforcement of neuromuscular diaphragmatic activity

  • Ventilation triggered directly by diaphragmatic activity, not by pressure or flow changes in the ventilator

  • Better synchrony

  • Proper positioning of the measuring probe can be cumbersome

  • Optimal setting is time-consuming

variable ("noisy”) PSV
  • Varying pressure-support levels for each breath, given in random order

  • Can be used simply and rapidly

  • Extrinsic variability is applied

  • Better lung function without damage to pulmonary parenchyma

  • Better synchrony

  • Airway pressures may be intermittently higher

ASV
  • The user sets the body weight, the desired minute volume, and the tolerable upper and lower limits

  • Closed-loop control of ventilation to optimize the relationship between tidal volume and respiratory rate

  • Reduced respiratory work

  • Can be used for controlled ventilaton and for all intermediate stages up to extubation

  • Better synchrony

  • Less labor-intensive for ICU personnel because of automatization

  • Risk of loss of control due to automatization of ventilation

  • Risk of "runaway,” especially with pathological breathing patterns

IntelliVent-ASV
  • Like ASV, with additional integration of oxygen saturation and end-tidal CO2 concentration in the algorithm

  • Better adaptation to the patient

  • Risk of loss of control due to automatization of ventilation

  • Risk of incorrect adjustment, especially with pathological breathing patterns

SmartCare
  • Automatic adjustment of pressure support to keep the patient in the respiratory comfort zone

  • Quicker weaning through automated trials of spontaneous respiration

  • Faulty adjustment in patients with neurologically impaired breathing regulation or respiratory muscles, severe bronchospasm, or agitation

HFOV, "high-frequency oscillatory ventilation”; ARDS, "adult respiratory distress syndrome”; PAV, "proportional assist ventilation”;

PAV+, "proportional assist ventilation with load-adjusted gain factors”; NAVA, "neurally adjusted ventilatory assist”;

PSV, "pressure-support ventilation”; ASV, "adaptive support ventilation”