Table 1.
Temperature of | Photoperiod during | LT50 | |
deacclimation(°C; day/night) | deacclimation(day length; h) | Winter cultivar‘Górczanski’ | Spring cultivar‘Star’ |
2/2 (control) | 12 | –14·8 ± 0·25 | –13·8 ± 0·24 |
2/12 | 12 | –14·5 ± 0·34 | –13·9 ± 0·35 |
12/2 | 12 | –14·7 ± 0·23 | –13·5 ± 0·31 |
12/12 | 12 | –14·3 ± 0·36 | –13·8 ± 0·32 |
12/12 | 8 | –14·5 ± 0·34 | –13·8 ± 0·21 |
12/12 | 16 | –14·2 ± 0·23 | –12·5 ± 0·27 |
12/20 | 12 | –14·6 ± 0·45 | –13·5 ± 0·21 |
20/12 | 12 | –12·9 ± 0·34 | –9·7 ± 0·38 |
20/20 | 12 | –12·1 ± 0·23 | –8·3 ± 0·51 |
20/20 | 8 | –12·2 ± 0·37 | –7·8 ± 0·38 |
20/20 | 16 | –11·8 ± 0·45 | –6·8 ± 0·24 |
LT50 was measured after 4 weeks of reacclimation at 2 °C by means of electrolyte leakage tests from frozen leaf discs.Indicated confidence intervals for P = 0·05.