Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 17.
Published in final edited form as: Leukemia. 2014 Apr 4;28(9):1774–1783. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.124

Table 2.

Incidence and prognosis of DNMT3A and IDH1/2 mutations in AML, MDS and myeloproliferative neoplasms

Study DNMT3A IDH1 IDH2 Association of mutation with prognosis Reference
AML
Mardis et al. (n =80) ND 16% in NC ND IDH1: no association with OS; possible worse OS in AML with NC and wild-type NPM1 55
Marcucci et al. (n =358) ND 14% 19% IDH1: worse DFS
IDH2 (R172): lower CR
49
Wagner et al. (n =275) ND R132: 10.9% ND IDH1 R132: no association with prognosis
NPM1/mutated FLT3
52
Paschka et al. (n =805) ND 7.6% 8.7% IDH1/2: worse RFS and OS in NC with mutated NPM1/wild-type FLT3 50
Abbas et al. (n =893) ND 6% 11% IDH1/2: worse OS in NC with wild-type
NPM1/wild-type FLT3
47
Caramazza et al. (n =26) ND IDH1/2: 19% in AML with trisomy 8 IDH1/2: 19% in AML with trisomy 8 ND 53
Figueroa et al. (n =385) ND 6.2% 8.6% (IDH1/2: 27.1% in NC) ND 25
Ley et al. (n =281) 22.1% (33.7% in NC) ND ND DNMT3A: worse OS 16
Patel et al. (n =199) ND 6% 2% (IDH1/2: 11.8% in NC) ND 56
Chou et al. (n =446) ND 6.1% 12.1% IDH1: no association with prognosis
IDH2: better prognosis, but worse OS in mutated FLT3
27
Yan et al. (n =112) 20.5% ND ND DNMT3A: worse IS, time to treatment failure and lower CR 18
Thol et al. (n =489) 17.8% ND ND DNMT3A: worse OS overall; worse OS and CR in NC; worse OS, RFS and lower CR in NC with wild-type
NPM1/wild-type FLT3
20
Shen et al. (n =605) 12.3% 9.3% 9.8% DNMT3A: worse OS, EFS and lower CR
IDH1/2: no association with prognosis
36
Hou et al. (n =500) 14% (22.9% in NC) ND ND DNMT3A: worse OS and RFS 39
Markova et al. (n =226) 29.6% in NC ND ND DNMT3A: higher relapse rate, especially in mutated FLT3 41
Chotirat et al. (n =230) ND 8.7% 10.4% IDH1/2: no association with prognosis 54
Marcucci et al. (n =415) 35.3% in age<60; 33.3% in age≥60 ND ND DNMT3A: worse DFS, trend toward worse OS
Younger patients with non-R882 mutations: worse DFS and OS
Older patients with R882 mutations: shorter DFS and OS
21
Patel et al. (n =398) 23% 7% 8% DNMT3A: worse OS in mutated FLT3; predictive of response to high-dose daunorubicin
IDH1/2: better OS in mutated NPM1
IDH2: better OS
43
Ravandi et al. (n =170) ND IDH1/2: 30% IDH1/2: 30% IDH1/2: no association with prognosis; worse OS in mutated NPM1/wild-type FLT3 51
Renneville et al. (n =123) 29% in NC ND ND DNMT3A: worse OS and EFS 44
Ribeiro et al. (n =415) 23.1% ND ND DNMT3A: worse OS and RFS, especially in wild-type NPM1/wild-type FLT3 23
Fernandez-Mercado et al. (n =84) 16.7% in NC 12.2% in NC 12.2% in NC ND 37
Hájková et al. (n =79) 41% ND ND ND 22
Westman et al. (n =11) ND IDH1/2: 12% IDH1/2: 12% ND 59
Ostronoff et al. (n =191) 19% ND ND DNMT3A: worse OS, EFS and RFS 42
Koszarska et al. (n =376) ND 8.5% 7.5% IDH1/2: no association with prognosis
IDH1 R132H: worse OS
48
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (n =200) 26% IDH1/2: 20% IDH1/2: 20% ND 11
Gaidzik et al. (n =1770) 20.9% ND ND DNMT3A: no association with prognosis
R882: worse RFS
non-R882: better OS
38
Roller et al. (n =194) 41% in NC ND ND ND 45
Hou et al. (n =318) 14.9% (19.5% in NC) ND ND DNMT3A: worse OS and EFS 40
Haferlach et al. (n =1291) 30.9% 8.8% 16.4% ND 46
MDS
Kosmider et al. (n =100) ND 2% 3% IDH1/2: no impact on survival 69
Patnaik et al. (n =88) ND 0% 0% ND 72
Rocquain et al. (n =65) ND 3% 5% ND 102
Thol et al. (n =193) ND 4% 0% IDH1: associated with inferior OS and higher rate of transformation to AML 71
Ewalt et al. (n =100) 5% ND ND ND 66
Brecqueville et al. (n =66) 6% IDH1/2: 5% IDH1/2: 5% ND 65
Walter et al. (n =150) 8.7% ND ND DNMT3A: worse OS and increased progression to AML 68
Lin et al. (n =51) 7.8% ND ND DNMT3A: worse OS 64
Thol et al. (n =193) 2.6% ND ND DNMT3A: increased progression to AML 67
Patnaik et al. (n =277) ND 3% 9% IDH1: associated with inferior survival 70
Roller et al. (n =115) 13% ND ND DNMT3A: no impact on survival 45
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Green et al. (n =180) ND 0% 0% ND 77
Kosmider et al. (n =100 CMML) ND 0% 8% IDH1/2: no impact on survival 69
Pardanani et al. (n =166) ND IDH1/2: 3% IDH1/2: 3% ND 78
Tefferi et al. (n =1422) ND 1% 1% IDH1/2: no impact on survival in 111 patients with primary myelofibrosis 80
Brecqueville et al. (n =135) 1% 0% 0% ND 65
Abdel-Wahab et al. (n =68 MPN; 15 CMML) 4% (MPN)
0% (CMML)
ND ND DNMT3A: no patients underwent leukemic transformation in follow-up time 74
Stegelmann et al. (n =80) 5% ND ND ND 76
Jankowski et al. (n =52 CMML) 4% ND ND DNMT3A: no impact on survival 75
Tefferi et al. (n =130 PMF) ND 4% 5% IDH1/2: inferior OS and LFS, more pronounced in presence of JAK2V617F 79
Vannucchi et al. (n =879 PMF) 5.7% IDH1/2: 2.6% IDH1/2: 2.6% IDH1/2: inferior LFS 81

Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CMML, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; CR, complete remission; DFS, disease-free survival; EFS, event-free survival; LFS, leukemia-free survival; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasms; NC, normal cytogenetics; ND, not determined; OS, overall survival; PMF, primary myelofibrosis; RFS, relapse-free survival.