Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e110260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110260

Table 2. Results of the quality predictions (including anchor conditions) for the normal hearing subjects, expressed by linear correlation coefficients and rank correlation coefficients (italic).

measure ind. av.
qc+W-B (M2) 0.84 0.86
0.89 0.93
qc-W-B (M4) 0.84 0.87
0.84 0.95
PSM_lp-B (M12) 0.85 0.88
0.84 0.91
PSM_fb-B (M10) 0.88 0.89
0.92 0.98
HASQcomb (M19) 0.54 0.54
0.24 0.19
PESQ (M21) 0.64 0.64
0.41 0.45
Soveral (M25)l 0.76 0.76
0.63 0.64
LPD (M22) −0.75 −0.77
0.64 0.62
LAR (M27) −0.83 −0.84
0.74 0.71

Subjective ratings were averaged across subjects. Middle column: correlations based on ratings for individual talkers (ind.); right column: ratings averaged across talkers (av.). Quality measure suffixes: fb/lp: modulation filterbank/lowpass model version; +/−W: with/without frequency band weighting; +/−B: with/without asymmetric weighting of differences (“Beerends weighting”).