Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e111885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111885

Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

First author & year Country or region No. of patients Mean age Gender(M/F) (C+N)/T Level of evidence Stage Clinicopathological features Method antibody source Dilution Blind evaluation Definition standard* ProvidedOS data
Jin 2014 Korea 302 54.88(25–77) 254/48 (233+10)/243 5 I–IV D, T IHC NR NR Yes CS Yes
Lee 2014 USA 89 51 (20–75) 78/11 (21+8)/29 4 I–IV D IHC (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) 1∶50 Yes CS NR
Witjes 2013 Netherlands 47 65 (21–82) 23/24 (0+16)/16 4 NR D,T IHC (DAKO, Japan) NR Yes ≥Focal/diffuse NR
Geng 2012 China 85 NR 77/8 (52+6)/58 4 I–IV D,T IHC (BD Biosciences, USA) 1∶400 Yes CS Yes
Zhao 2012 China 97 52.86 82/15 (?+?)/66 5 I–IV D,M IHC (Santa Cruz Biotech, USA) 1∶100 Yes CS Yes
Feng 2011 China 63 45.8±10.6 (24–74) 51/12 (35+0)/35 4 NR D,M IHC (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) NR Yes >10%cells NR
Cheng 2011 Hong Kong 25 47.92(14–72) 23/2 (8+0)/8 3 NR D IHC (DAKO, Japan) 1∶100 Yes CS NR
Liu 2010 China 200 NR 169/31 (?+?)/87 4 I–IIIa D,T,M IHC (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) NR Yes Stronger than non-cancerous Yes
Zulehner 2010 Austria 133 54.7±9 113/20 (0+78)/78 4 NR D,M, T IHC (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, UK) 1∶100 Yes > low staining NR
Du 2009 China 43 49(29–72) 36/7 (17+0)/17 3 NR D,T,M IHC (Abgent Biotechnology, CA) 1∶50 Yes > weak NR
Yu 2009 China 314 NR 266/48 (?+?)/126 5 I–III D,T,M IHC (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) 1∶200 Yes >10% cells Yes
Yang 2009 Taiwan 123 NR 104/19 (?+?)/53 5 I–IV D,T,M IHC (Abcam plc.) 1∶1000 Yes >10% cells Yes
Korita 2008 Japan 125 63(16–79) 88/37 (0+16)/16 3 NR D,T IHC (Novocastra Laboratories Ltd, Newcastleupon-Tyne, United Kingdom) 1∶200 Yes CS NR
Zhai 2008 China 97 54(34–72) 67/30 (36+6)/42 3 I–IV D,T,M IHC (Santa Clauze Corporation, USA) 1∶200 Yes CS Yes
Park 2005 Korea 92 51.6(26–89) 75/17 (?+?)/30 3 I–IV D IHC (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, Lexington, KY) NR Yes CS NR
Tien 2005 Japan 32 64(36–86) 20/8 (7+8)/15 3 NR D IHC (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) 1∶200 Yes Stronger than non-cancerous NR
Schmitt Graff 2003 Germany 196 65.3(10.7–86.0) 157/39 (84+73)/157 3 I–IV NR IHC (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY, USA) 1:6000 Yes ≥Focal Yes
Inagawa 2002 Japan 51 63.5(45–79) 33/18 (0+18)/18 4 NR D IHC (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) 1∶200 Yes Stronger than non-cancerous NR
Suzuki 2002 Japan 50 62.4±9.9 38/12 (42+11)/53 3 NR D,M,T IHC (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) 1∶200 Yes Stronger than non-cancerous NR
Endo 2000 Japan 107 60(17–80) 87/20 (?+?)/84 4 NR D IHC (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) 1∶100 Yes CS Yes
Huang 1999 Japan/Switzerland 22 62.7±6.3(49–75) 17/5 (0+11)/11 3 NR D IHC (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) 1∶1000– 2000 Yes ≥ Focal NR
Ihara 1996 Japan 41 60.1(42–77) 38/3 (?+?)/58 3 NR D IHC (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) 10 mg/ml Yes CS NR

CS: complex score combining intensity and percentage; IHC: immunohistochemistry; D: histologic differentiation degree; T: depth of tumor invasion; M: metastasis; OS: overall survival; NR: not reported; *: The definition standard of β-catenin overexpression in cytoplasm or nucleus; (C+N)/T: the number of tissue samples with β-catenin overexpression in cytoplasm(C) (+) nucleus (N); C: cytoplasm; N: nucleus; T: total, T = C+N; ?: no information was provided.