Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 16;48(3):280–291. doi: 10.1111/medu.12303

Table 1.

Frequency of process and non-process responses to microanalytic questions: goal setting, strategic planning, and metacognitive monitoring for 71 second-year medical students engaged in a clinical reasoning task, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, academic years 2010–2011 and 2011–2012

Response category Goal setting* Strategic planning* Metacognitive monitoring*
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Task-specific process 23 (32.4) 24 (33.8) 64 (90.1)
Identifying symptoms 16 (69.6) 12 (50.0) 33 (51.6)
Identifying contextual factors 2 (8.7) 3 (12.5) 22 (34.4)
Prioritising relevant symptoms 3 (13.0) 2 (8.3) 9 (14.1)
Integrating/synthesising symptoms 13 (56.5) 11 (45.8) 38 (59.4)
Comparing/contrasting diagnoses 2 (8.7) 4 (16.7) 11 (17.2)
Task-general process 16 (22.5) 19 (26.8) 14 (19.7)
Outcome 13 (18.2) N/A 3 (4.2)
Self-control 2 (2.8) 11 (15.5) 6 (8.5)
Non-task strategies 6 (8.5) 11 (15.5) N/A
Perceived ability N/A N/A 2 (2.8)
Task difficulty N/A N/A 3 (4.2)
Teacher skill N/A N/A 0
Do not know/none 22 (31) 1 (1.4) N/A
Other 4 (5.6) 18 (25.4) 2 (2.8)

N/A = response category was not applicable to the particular microanalytic question.

Column numbers represent the number (n) and percentage (%) of the total sample of 71 students who provided a particular response category. The total percentage in each column is >100% because students’ responses to a given question could be coded to more than one response category to each microanalytic question.

*

For goal setting, five students provided responses coded into more than one response category; for strategic planning, 8 students provided responses coded into more than one response category; for metacognitive monitoring, 23 students provided responses coded into more than one response category.

Column numbers represent the number (n) of students who provided a response coded as one of the five key strategies within the task-specific process response category. The percentage (%) is calculated by dividing this number by the subset of students who provided a task-specific response. Thus, for goal setting, the denominator is 23; for strategic planning, the denominator is 24; for metacognitive monitoring, the denominator is 64.

A response of ‘do not know/none’ indicates that a do not know/none response was provided without reference to any other response category. If a participant’s response included both a do not know/none and a distinct response category, the do not know/other response was ignored.