Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of Depressed Clients (N=1,018) in Outcomes Analysis, by Intervention Condition*
| Characteristics | Overall (N=1018) | RS (N=504) | CEP (N=514) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service sector, no. (%) | |||
| Primary care or public health | 290 (28.5) | 134 (26.6) | 156 (30.4) |
| Mental health services | 195 (19.2) | 110 (21.8) | 85 (16.5) |
| Substance abuse | 230 (22.6) | 111 (22.0) | 119 (23.2) |
| Homeless services | 162 (15.9) | 92 (18.3) | 70 (13.6) |
| Community-based | 141 (13.9) | 57 (11.3) | 84 (16.3) |
| Age, years | 44.8 ± 12.7 | 44.2 ± 12.3 | 45.3 ± 13.0 |
| Female, no. (%) | 595 (58.4) | 286 (56.7) | 309 (60.1) |
| Ethnicity, no. (%)† | |||
| Latino | 409 (40.2) | 194 (38.5) | 215 (41.8) |
| African American | 488 (47.9) | 239 (47.4) | 249 (48.4) |
| Non-Hispanic white | 86 (8.4) | 45 (8.9) | 41 (8.0) |
| Other | 35 (3.4) | 26 (5.2) | 9 (1.8) |
| Married or living with partner, no. (%) | 231 (22.7) | 116 (23.0) | 115 (22.5) |
| Less than high school education, no. (%) | 446 (43.8) | 221 (43.9) | 224 (43.7) |
| ≥3 chronic medical conditions of 18, no. (%) | 548 (53.8) | 270 (53.6) | 278 (54.0) |
| Family income from work, past 12 months≤$10,000, no. (%) | 755 (74.1) | 374 (74.2) | 381 (74.0) |
| Family income under federal poverty level, no. (%) | 750 (73.7) | 373 (74.0) | 377 (73.3) |
| No health insurance, no. (%) | 545 (53.5) | 286 (56.7) | 259 (50.4) |
| Working for pay, no. (%) | 205 (20.1) | 105 (20.9) | 100 (19.4) |
| 12-month depressive disorder, no. (%) | 629 (61.8) | 311 (61.8) | 318 (61.8) |
| Probable depression (PHQ-8≥10) | 992 (97.7) | 490 (97.4) | 502 (98.0) |
| PHQ-8 score, mean (SD) | 14.9 ± 4.1 | 15.0 ± 4.2 | 14.8 ± 4.1 |
| Alcohol abuse or use of illicit drugs 12 months, no. (%) | 398 (39.1) | 180 (35.8) | 218 (42.4) |
| Poor mental health-related quality of life, no. (%)‡ | 546 (53.6) | 271 (53.7) | 275 (53.5) |
*
Data are presented as No. (%) or mean (SD).
RS=Resources for Services or individual program technical assistance; CEP=Community Engagement and Planning; Plus–minus values are means ±SD; data were multiply imputed; Chi-square test was used for comparing two groups accounting for the design effect of the cluster randomization
†
P>0.30 for all comparisons except for ethnicity p=.03
‡
MCS-12≤40; one standard deviation below population mean.