Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 25;25(6):1436–1450. doi: 10.1093/beheco/aru135

Table 2.

Singing patterns associated with approach order (I = instigator, or first to approach; R = responder, or second to approach; N = never approached)

Source df L-R χ2 P Direction
A. Pre interaction singing and context variables that were correlated with approach order (I, R, N: dependent variables), controlling for dyadID and nested interaction number and omitting cases of 0 approaching birds and Pre number of songs < 3, n = 331
 Female present 1 5.249 0.0220 I < R < N
 Percent rattle-buzz songs 1 17.707 <0.0001 I > R ≈ N
B. Pre interaction singing and context variables that were correlated with approach order (I, R: dependent variables), controlling for dyadID and nested interaction number and omitting cases of 0 and 1 approaching birds and Pre number of songs < 3, n = 209
 Percent overlapping 1 6.727 0.0095 I < R
 Percent rattle-buzz songs 1 8.245 0.0041 I > R
C. During interaction singing and context variables that were correlated with approach order (I, R, N: dependent variables), controlling for dyadID and nested interaction number and omitting cases of 0 approaching birds and during number of songs < 3, n = 299
 Percent rattle-buzz songs 1 4.857 0.0275 I > R > N
D. During interaction singing and context variables that were correlated with approach order (I, R: dependent variables), controlling for dyadID and nested interaction number and omitting cases of 0 and 1 approaching birds and during number of songs < 3, n = 188
 Percent incomplete songs 1 6.747 0.0094 I > R