Table 5.
Adjusted hazard ratio (HRa) of traditional Confucian variables regressed on sex behavior in the 3 cities by Multi-Cox model (95% CI)
| Hanoi | Shanghai | Taipei | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confucian values | Comp. | Ref. | Male (N=3095) |
Female (N=3109) |
Male (N=2983) |
Female (N=3040) |
Male (N=2168) |
Female (N=2159) |
| Family concepts | 5–7 | 0–4 | 0.41* (0.23–0.70) |
0.35 (0.10–1.27) |
1.25* (1.03–1.51) |
1.51* (1.15–1.99) |
1.70* (1.19–2.43) |
0.73* (0.55–0.99) |
| 8–11 | 0.38* (0.22–0.65) |
0.22* (0.06–0.79) |
1.45 (0.95–2.23) |
1.76* (0.97–3.19) |
1.77* (1.23–2.52) |
0.83 (0.62–1.13) |
||
| Self-cultivation Values | 2–3 | 0–1 | 0.57* (0.36–0.91) |
0.72 (0.27–1.94) |
0.79* (0.64–0.98) |
0.48* (0.37–0.64) |
0.91 (0.78–1.07) |
0.97 (0.81–1.16) |
| 4–5 | 0.45 * (0.29–0.70) |
0.63 (0.24–1.63) |
0.58* (0.45–0.74) |
0.36* (0.25–0.50) |
0.76* (0.63–0.92) |
0.78* (0.63–0.97) |
||
| Gender role con. | 2 | 0–1 | 0.61* (0.37–0.99) |
0.74 (0.37–1.47) |
1.12 (0.93–1.34) |
1.21 (0.88–1.65) |
1.19* (1.04–1.36) |
1.17 (0.98–1.39) |
| 3 | 0.76 (0.41–1.40) |
0.25 (0.03–2.31) |
1.64* (1.06–2.52) |
4.13* (1.60–10.61) |
1.96* (1.42–2.70) |
3.17* (1.13–8.92) |
||
| Sexual values | 1 | 0 | 0.45* (0.34–0.59) |
0.21* (0.13–0.35) |
0.63* (0.52–0.75) |
0.27* (0.21–0.36) |
0.70* (0.61–0.80) |
0.52* (0.43–0.61) |
| 2 | 0.33* (0.20–0.52) |
0.08* (0.03–0.22) |
0.31* (0.21–0.44) |
0.15* (0.09–0.26) |
0.61* (0.43–0.88) |
0.35* (0.21–0.59) |
||
Adjusted for economic status, school status, education level and residence.
*
p≤ 0.05