Table 2.
Comparison between OA and CA in sample size 65.
| OA | CA | GAP1 | GAP2 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Idle load time (min) | Total Time (min) | CPU (s) | Idle load time (min) | Total time (min) | ||||||
| Max | Min | Avg. | Max | Min | Avg. | |||||
| 26.1 | 23.8 | 24.5 | 106.7 | 55.6 | 55.2 | 55.4 | 56.7 | 138.96 | 56.8% | 23.2% |
Notes: GAP1 = (idle load time of RMGC obtained from CA − average idle load time of RMGC obtained from OA) ∗ 100/idle load time of RMGC obtained from CA; GAP2 = (total time of RMGC obtained from CA − average total time of RMGC obtained from OA) ∗ 100/total time of RMGC obtained from CA.