Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 4;3(5):343–356. doi: 10.1007/s40037-014-0122-3

Table 3.

Socio-demographic characteristics and N-GAMS subscales scores of three study cohorts

Modular cohort N = 48 Mainstream cohort N = 45 Control cohort N = 45 p* Eta squared
2007 2011 2007 2011 2007 2011
Age, mean years (SD) 29.6 (4.2) 31.7 (4.5) 29.5 (3.7) 32.4 (3.7) 29.1 (4.3) 32.0 (4.1) 0.840
Gender, female (%) 32 (66.7) 34 (75.6) 33 (70.2) 0.639
Western ethnicity, number (%) 44 (91.6) 42 (97.6) 41 (95.5) 0.435
Working experience, mean years 2.50 2.49 2.38 0.963
Previous gender education (%) 62.5 100 27.3 77.8 45.7 68.1 0.003b
Gender sensitivity, mean (SD) 3.78 (0.38) 3.98 (0.35) 3.70 (0.36) 3.83 (0.52) 3.65 (0.37) 3.80 (0.32) 0.679 0.006
Mean change in scorea 0.20b 0.13 0.15b
GRI patients, mean (SD) 2.42 (0.59) 2.42 (0.48) 2.04 (0.56) 2.21 (0.63) 2.20 (0.59) 2.45 (0.60) 0.138 0.029
Mean change in scorea 0.00 0.17 0.25b
GRI doctors, mean (SD) 2.41 (0.42) 2.50 (0.45) 2.19 (0.47) 2.50 (0.73) 2.30 (0.47) 2.50 (0.56) 0.288 0.018
Mean change in scorea 0.09 0.21b 0.20b
Gender knowledge, mean (SD) 10.25 (1.59) 11.64 (1.60) 10.47 (1.84) 10.80 (1.64) 9.82 (1.40) 11.08 (1.69) 0.049b 0.043
Mean change in scorea 1.39b 0.33 1.26b

One-way ANOVA (means) or Chi square (percentages); to test whether means between cohorts differ

GRI gender role ideology (gender stereotyping)

aDependent Student’s t test; to test of whether means within cohort differ

b p < 0.05; comparisons significant, otherwise all comparisons non-significant