Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Oct 9;22(12):2508–2516. doi: 10.1002/oby.20889

Table 1. Rater agreement on adequate performance in the delivery of MIC and NPC strategies.

Number of Sessions Meeting Criterion (n=15) Rater Agreement

Rater 1 Rater 2
MIC Sessions
MI-Consistent Strategies
  MI spirit 14 15 93%
  Open questions 15 15 100%
  Reflections 15 15 100%
  Affirmations 13 15 87%
  Fostering collaboration 12 15 80%
  Motivation for change 12 14 87%
  Client-centered discussion & feedback 12 12 80%
  Exploring pros/cons/ambivalence 0 0 100%
  Developing discrepancies 1 0 93%
  Change planning discussion 14 15 93%
MI-Inconsistent Strategies
  Unsolicited advice 4 1 80%
  Direct confrontation 0 0 100%
  Asserting authority 0 0 100%
NPC Sessions
NPC-Consistent Strategies
  Psychoeducation about nutrition topic 15 15 100%
  Provide patient opportunity to ask questions 14 14 100%
NPC-Inconsistent Strategies
  Discuss patient's motivations to lose weight 0 0 100%
  Change planning discussion 0 0 100%

Note: MIC=Motivational Interviewing and Internet Condition. NPC=Nutrition Psychoeducation and Internet Condition. UC=Usual Care. Adequate performance criterion = demonstration of the strategy at least 3 times in the session with adequate skill. Fifteen sessions per condition (N=30) were randomly selected for two trained judges to independently rate.