Table 1. Rater agreement on adequate performance in the delivery of MIC and NPC strategies.
Number of Sessions Meeting Criterion (n=15) | Rater Agreement | ||
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Rater 1 | Rater 2 | ||
MIC Sessions | |||
MI-Consistent Strategies | |||
MI spirit | 14 | 15 | 93% |
Open questions | 15 | 15 | 100% |
Reflections | 15 | 15 | 100% |
Affirmations | 13 | 15 | 87% |
Fostering collaboration | 12 | 15 | 80% |
Motivation for change | 12 | 14 | 87% |
Client-centered discussion & feedback | 12 | 12 | 80% |
Exploring pros/cons/ambivalence | 0 | 0 | 100% |
Developing discrepancies | 1 | 0 | 93% |
Change planning discussion | 14 | 15 | 93% |
MI-Inconsistent Strategies | |||
Unsolicited advice | 4 | 1 | 80% |
Direct confrontation | 0 | 0 | 100% |
Asserting authority | 0 | 0 | 100% |
NPC Sessions | |||
NPC-Consistent Strategies | |||
Psychoeducation about nutrition topic | 15 | 15 | 100% |
Provide patient opportunity to ask questions | 14 | 14 | 100% |
NPC-Inconsistent Strategies | |||
Discuss patient's motivations to lose weight | 0 | 0 | 100% |
Change planning discussion | 0 | 0 | 100% |
Note: MIC=Motivational Interviewing and Internet Condition. NPC=Nutrition Psychoeducation and Internet Condition. UC=Usual Care. Adequate performance criterion = demonstration of the strategy at least 3 times in the session with adequate skill. Fifteen sessions per condition (N=30) were randomly selected for two trained judges to independently rate.