Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 19.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2014 Jan 22;506(7487):179–184. doi: 10.1038/nature12929

Table 2. Ratios of functional classes of de novo mutations across various samples.

Classes of de novo mutation in the present study, previous studies of schizophrenia (Gulsuner14 and Xu13), and in all studies of schizophrenia combined (SZ (ALL)), which includes this study and an additional small study12. ASD = Autism Spectrum Disorder, ID = Intellectual Disability. Controls are unaffected individuals or unaffected siblings of probands with ASD or SZ. To control for factors that influence estimates of absolute rates (sequencing depth, calling, parental age, etc.), we tested for differences between the ratios of classes of de novo mutations (nonsynonymous to silent, loss-of-function to missense) in the disorder groups and the controls, using Fisher’s exact test. Nominally significant p-values (<0.05) are bold. NS = nonsynonymous, S = synonymous (silent), LoF = loss-of-function.

Controls7-10,13-14 Current study Schizophrenia (ref.14) Schizophrenia (ref.13) Schizophrenia all (refs 12-14) Autism spectrum disorder6-9 Intellectual disability10,11
Nonsynonymous 434 482 68 137 702 789 141
Synonymous 155 155 29 27 211 255 25
Ratio 2.8 3.1 2.3 5.1 3.3 3.1 5.6

P vs. Controls - 0.43 0.46 0.0097 0.18 0.41 0.0027

Loss-of-function 49 64 12 20 100 134 34
Missense 376 408 56 113 588 638 104
Ratio 0.13 0.16 0.21 0.18 0.17 0.21 0.33

P vs. Controls - 0.37 0.17 0.29 0.17 0.0072 0.0003